find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Brandis’ remarks betray ‘disrespect for the judicial system’

Brandis’ remarks betray ‘disrespect for the judicial system’

Sue.Higginson

The legal team behind the Carmichael coal mine suit has criticised Attorney-General George Brandis for calling for changes to environmental laws in order to restrict “vigilante litigation”.

Senator Brandis said legislative reform is needed to prevent the rise of “lawfare”, where community groups use the courts as a political weapon. 

Principal solicitor at EDO NSW Sue Higginson (pictured) told Lawyers Weekly there was “absolutely no evidence” to substantiate Senator Brandis’ “extreme and radical claims".

“[The use of terms like 'lawfare' and 'vigilante litigation'] really reflect a disrespect for the judicial system and the community's right to participate in that system,” she said.

Ms Higginson recently acted for Mackay Conservation Group in a Federal Court case, which successfully challenged the government’s approval of the $16 billion Carmichael mine in Queensland.

The ruling, handed down earlier this month, found that the Commonwealth government had failed to take into account advice about two vulnerable species when approving the mine.

Senator Brandis said he was “appalled” by the court’s decision to revoke approval for Australia’s largest coal mine. He criticised standing provisions in section 487 (2) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, under which the challenge had taken place. 

He said the “extremely loose” statutory language allows people with “political vendettas against development [to] game the system”.

Senator Brandis said the current laws made it possible for “virtually anyone” who had engaged in conservation or environmental research in the past two years to challenge determinations.

Ms Higginson said community-led court action has a long history in environmental law and that these standing provisions are working as they should.

“The very nature of environmental challenges [is that they] are ordinarily brought by members of the community that don't have a private or a propriety or a financial interest,” she said.

It is for this reason that the EPBC Act allows for community members to bring claims.

“These laws are historic. They have been accepted by governments of all walks as being a necessary component to the system of environmental law,” Ms Higginson said.

She said the Adani Carmichael Federal Court litigation is “testament to the rule of law and our current laws working really well”.

“The government made an error of law, the community was able to highlight that error of law in an independent centre of arbitration, namely the judiciary," she said.

“And the government itself responsibly conceded its defeat so the matter was never required to go even to a full hearing.”

Ms Higginson argued that, if anything, the Commonwealth laws were too restrictive, given that under state legislation any individual can bring a claim without needing to prove that they have background in conservation.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Brandis’ remarks betray ‘disrespect for the judicial system’
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Applauds
07:00
LCA applauds proposed Modern Slavery Act
The Law Council of Australia has welcomed new recommendations for the development of a Modern Slaver...
Mentoring
07:00
Top-tier offers targeted mentoring for Indigenous law students
Students at Macquarie University will be the first to benefit from a new Indigenous mentoring progra...
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...