find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Federal Court most costly court again

Federal Court most costly court again

THE FEDERAL COURT has once again replaced the NT Supreme Court as the most costly court per civil case for taxpayers, according to a Productivity Commission’s government services report.Each…

THE FEDERAL COURT has once again replaced the NT Supreme Court as the most costly court per civil case for taxpayers, according to a Productivity Commission’s government services report.

Each case in the Federal Court cost almost $16,767 to finalise in 2004-05, almost 45 per cent more than in the previous financial year.

Net recurrent expenditure per finalisation in the Federal Court had declined in the previous two years from $15,881 per case in 2001-02, to $11, 570 per finalised case in 2004-05.

The NT Supreme Court and the Federal Court have vied with each other for the status of most expensive drain on public coffers in that period. In 2003-04, the NT took the gong at $19,571 per finalisation, up more than 64 per cent on the previous year. This year it is down again, more than 42 per cent, to second most expensive on $11,253 each.

In 2002-03, the Federal Court was the most costly over the NT Supreme Court by just $2,000 per case. In 2001-02, each case finalised in the NT cost nearly $20,000.

The Productivity Commission said it was difficult to compare courts in different jurisdictions as the types of case heard can differ. The Federal Court, for instance, now mostly has fewer, more resource intensive and complicated trials since the Federal Magistrates Court began operating in 2000, increasing the cost per finalisation. At the same time, the Federal Magistrates Court also still draws upon Federal Court resources to function.

Net expenditure per finalisation tends to be higher in the NT in part because it is a small jurisdiction with relatively few cases across which to spread the costs of a fully functioning supreme court. The territory also has higher costs than many jurisdictions associated with supplying court services to a geographically dispersed population.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Federal Court most costly court again
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...