Rejection of mandatory sentencing for firearm offences welcomed

By Lara Bullock|24 August 2015

A leading legal body has voiced its support for the Senate’s rejection of mandatory sentencing provisions for firearm offences.

The Law Council of Australia has welcomed the Senate’s decision not to proceed with mandatory sentencing provisions for firearm offences under the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers, Offence and Other Measures) Bill 2015.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Earlier this year the Law Council of Australia appeared before a Senate committee to argue that while some aspects of the bill were sound, mandatory sentencing was inadvisable.

The Law Council president Duncan McConnel said “the hands of the judiciary should not be tied; that is not the way our system is designed to operate.”

SPONSORED CONTENT

“The overwhelming weight of evidence tells us that mandatory minimum sentences are not an effective deterrent,” Mr McConnel said.

“When judges are not constrained by a compulsory minimum penalty, research demonstrates that 90 per cent of sentences are considered by the public as appropriate once the particular circumstances of the case are fully disclosed.”

Mr McConnel noted that unintended consequences can arise from mandatory minimums, such as those who commit minor crimes being unfairly penalised.

Rejection of mandatory sentencing for firearm offences welcomed
Intro image
lawyersweekly logo
News

latest

Nicola Gobbo

Nicola Gobbo’s conduct ‘duplicitous, inexcusable’, final report finds

Can law firms mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for employees

Can law firms mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for employees?

The Torres Strait Islander experience in law

‘A minority within a minority’: The Torres Strait Islander experience in law

Renewal key to legal sector sustainability in 2020

Renewal key to legal sector sustainability in 2020

FROM THE WEB
Recommended by Spike Native Network