find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Social media won’t start ‘wildfire’ of defamation cases

Social media won’t start ‘wildfire’ of defamation cases

Johnathan.Quilty

Defamation claims involving content published on Twitter or Facebook are on the rise, but checks and balances built into defamation law should prevent an avalanche of lawsuits, says a Lander & Rogers partner.

“While social media has seen an increase in defamation-type claims, […] you won’t see a wildfire,” Johnathan Quilty (pictured) predicted. 

Mr Quilty spoke to Lawyers Weekly following the release of statistics by Slater and Gordon showing that almost half the defamation inquiries made to the firm were related to social media last year.

Forty-three per cent were complaints about Facebook posts and the rest were related to Twitter, Instagram and general internet publications.

Mr Quilty said he has noticed a similar trend in his own practice but doubted the community would, as he put it, “go on a rampage” and clog the court with defamation claims.

He gave two reasons: firstly, that there are many defences available to effectively shut down defamation claims and, secondly, that the high cost of legal advice often outweighs the $376,500 statutory cap on damages, which applies to defamation cases.

Federal treasurer Joe Hockey, for instance, was left in the red after winning a case against Fairfax Media over a defamatory tweet. He was awarded $200,000 but had to cover 85 per cent of his legal costs, which far exceeded the damages.

Despite the difficulty in bringing claims, Mr Quilty maintained that social media users must be aware that they are accountable for any content they publish online.

“People go onto social media and they have a brain dump,” he said. “They literally say what is on their mind at that particular moment in time and they just hit the button. What they forget is that they do reach a wide audience.”

Liability is not just restricted to the original publisher, he added. People are also responsible for the dissemination of content through re-tweets or shares.

However, defamation lawsuits are less practical where content goes viral and large numbers of people are implicated.

Last Monday, for example, the ABC accidentally aired a Twitter handle slandering Tony Abbott on Q&A. The insult quickly spread online, becoming a trending hashtag Australia-wide.

Mr Quilty said there is “the defence of innocent dissemination” in cases such as these. “But in circumstance where some of this stuff on social media is just blatantly defamatory and someone forwards it on knowing exactly what the content is, merely seeking to smear the reputation of someone else, they too can land themselves in hot water.”

His approach to dealing with defamation epidemics is to recommend that aggrieved parties adopt a ‘cease and desist' strategy.

Instead of embarking on expensive legal action, clients ask individual users to publicly apologise online.

“The message is then sent out to other re-tweeters or re-publishers that [the content] is entirely unacceptable,” he said.

Another option is to ask the social media platform itself to remove the content, as it does not comply with their policies.

Mr Quilty said he did not believe defamation law was “inappropriate or behind the times” when it comes to handing social media-related issues.

“While there are always going to be grey areas, I think that defamation laws are holding their ground and […] move with the times.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Social media won’t start ‘wildfire’ of defamation cases
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...