find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Increase in international arbitrations unlikely under TPP

Increase in international arbitrations unlikely under TPP

Giaretta.Ben

The largest trade agreement in a generation, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, will produce only a slight uptick in investor-state arbitrations, according to leading arbitration lawyers.

The TPP was finalised over the weekend after seven years of intense negotiation. The agreement, which has mostly been shrouded in secrecy, liberalises trade between 12 countries including the US, Australia and Japan.

The agreement was announced in a press conference in Atlanta on Monday. The final text of the 30 chapters is not yet available, but summaries of the agreement have been published online.

The central criticism of the TPP has been the inclusion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions.

In the version of the TPP leaked in March, Australia expressed reservations around these provisions, which allow foreign investors to bring legal actions against countries.

“The criticism, in short, is that these sorts of provisions […] interfere with the sovereignty of that state,” said Donald Robertson, a partner at Herbert Smith Freehills.

However, Mr Robertson doubts the TPP will produce “an acceleration of claims in any real sense”.  

He said the TPP is an “enormous deal” covering 40 per cent of global commerce, a market worth US$28 trillion.

“To that extent, yes, there will be an increase in claims, but there are many other provisions in other fields that already have those abilities,” he said.

Albert Monichino QC (pictured below), the president of the Australia Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, agreed with Mr Robertson’s assessment.

“I don't think [the TPP] will affect Australian arbitrators much at all, certainly in the short term,” he said.

The TPP will include safeguards to undermine abusive or frivolous claims. Mr Monichino said arbitrators should be aware of any special powers conferred on them, particularly if it is confirmed that arbitrators have the power to dismiss claims without merit.

Mr Robertson said the argument that ISDS provisions curtail sovereignty was “false criticism”.

He said that the economies of countries are connected more than ever before, and this “necessarily blurs the whole concept of […] sovereign borders”.

Trade traditionally involved the sale of a finished product from one country to another, he continued.

“Now those products are made in five different countries, assembled, reassembled, IP transferred from one country to another, and then the final product shipped back home and sold," said Mr Robertson.

“So the countries and the economies are intertwined. The TPP and these sorts of provisions simply recognise that.”

Ben Giaretta (pictured above), the head of international arbitration (Asia) at Ashurst, said there was a rise in investor-state arbitrations in the 1990s and 2000s but that these kinds of claims have started to level off.

“Things have changed now because people are much more aware of [ISDS provisions],” he said.

Mr Giaretta said these claims have decreased because governments are more wary about investment treaty rights when they take actions and are more sophisticated in the way they negotiate treaties.

“So you will see much more sophisticated language about expropriation and other matters, and what can be carved out in public interest,” he said.

The Gillard government took a hard stance against ISDS provisions, but the Liberal government has since relaxed that position. The final TPP includes ISDS provisions and makes Australia a party to those provisions, according to Mr Robertson.

Mr Giaretta said the TPP appears to strike more of a balance between access to arbitration for foreign investors and the government’s ability to regulate.

“My assumption is that the Australian government has become comfortable with the carve-outs in the TPP, and [believes] that the new provisions do not unduly fetter what the government can do in the public interest,” he said.

Mr Robertson said there were specific exceptions in the TPP allowing governments to regulate on environmental, health, human rights issues. He said these may not even be necessary as these carve-outs are available under general international law.

“It is only very extreme forms of regulatory interference and misconduct which would allow a claim to be made,” he said.

But even if there are not a large number of investor-state arbitrations under the TPP, Mr Giaretta suspects the TPP will lift the demand for international arbitrations between private companies.

“The TPP might lead to just simply more contracts being signed between Australian companies and companies in other countries,” he said.

“And those contracts might have arbitration provisions in them, and therefore there is likely to be more arbitration work.”

Like this story? Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive Lawyers Weekly every day straight to your inbox!

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Increase in international arbitrations unlikely under TPP
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...