find the latest legal job
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
‘User-pays’ model a threat to access to justice

‘User-pays’ model a threat to access to justice

A Tasmanian judge has spoken out against recommendations in the Productivity Commission’s Access to Justice Report allowing civil courts and tribunals to recover full costs.

Speaking at the recent Australian Lawyers Alliance conference in Hobart, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Estcourt said the so-called 'user-pays' model recommendation had largely gone under the radar and shouldn’t have.

The suggested model would see courts and tribunals recover their full costs in all cases, according to The Mercury.

Justice Estcourt said: “In my view they represent the single greatest threat to access to justice, and consequently to the rule of law, that I have witnessed in my professional lifetime.

“User-pays policies treat justice as a service that can be bought rather than as a public good provided by the judicial arm of government.”

According to Justice Estcourt cost-recovery principles ignored “the fundamental and essential function of courts in dispensing justice in a modern, democratic society”.

Some cost-recovery methods already have been introduced in response to the commission’s recommendations, such as increasing some Family Court costs, including the cost of filing for divorce.

Another example is the state government in Tasmania’s introduction of a criminal levy. The levy will set offenders back $150 if convicted in the Supreme Court and $50 for those convicted in the Magistrates Court.

ALA Tasmanian president Henry Pill said: “We know that the people who use courts the most are vulnerable people, including young people, people with mental health problems and victims of abuse or violence.

“Placing further fees on these people is unfair, they need more access to justice, not less.”

According to Mr Pill courts are “an essential part of our society and to tax people to use them is an unjust punishment”.

Update: The Productivity Commission issued a response to the report in the Mercury, saying its 2014 Access to Justice report did not recommend across the board full cost recovery.

According to the Commission, its report found that there was no consistent approach for setting court fees across jurisdictions and in many, fees were poorly targeted. The Commission put forward a more systematic approach for setting court fees, and only recommended full cost recovery in cases where parties had a substantial private interest at stake, such as large commercial matters.

"We recommended the money recovered from these types of cases be put back into the court system to improve it and to help fund legal assistance.” Commissioner Dr Warren Mundy said.

The report also recommended that costs should not increase for cases involving family violence, child protection, deprivation of liberty, guardianship, mental health and claims for asylum or protection, the Commission claimed.

“Our report was very mindful of the need for all people to have access to justice. Indeed, the focus of the report was helping people resolve their civil disputes more quickly and more cheaply,” Dr Mundy said.

Like this story? Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive Lawyers Weekly every day straight to your inbox!


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

‘User-pays’ model a threat to access to justice
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 22 2017
Reduced investment protections will make robust commercial arbitration mechanisms all the more critical for investors
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the current trend away from investor protect...
Nov 22 2017
‘Document tsunami’ driving lawyers to upskill in TAR
A prominent Victorian judge has highlighted the growing need for lawyers to expand their knowledge o...
Defamation expert appointed to lead Victorian Bar
Nov 22 2017
Defamation expert appointed to lead Victorian Bar
The Victorian Bar has named Dr Matt Collins QC as its new president, with an additional eight member...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...