find the latest legal job
Inhouse Legal Counsel -18 months-4 PAE - Real Estate Investment Company
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· In brand new prestigious CBD offices
View details
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
Law firm metrics ‘not much use to clients’

Law firm metrics ‘not much use to clients’

tape

Popular metrics for comparing law firms, including profit per partner and rankings systems, are poor indications of firm quality and status, according to one consultant.

While law firms place considerable weight on metrics such as profit per partner, Chambers rankings and M&A league tables, these measurements are unreliable at best and irrelevant at worst, according to Jordan Furlong, a partner at Edge International.

“What's interesting is that all these measures are employed by law firms in what amounts to preening contests among themselves to determine which is the ‘best’ firm, but they're not much use to clients,” Mr Furlong told Lawyers Weekly.

Profit per partner is the most prominent metric used to compare firms in Australia and the US, but is not used in Canada, where Mr Furlong is based.

Law firms typically submit profit per partner figures to independent bodies or media outlets that collate and publish the information on a yearly basis.

In Australia, the figures are published in the Australian Financial Review; in the US the 200-250 largest law firms voluntarily submit their profit information to periodicals such as The American Lawyer and The National Law Journal.

Speaking with Lawyers Weekly, consultant Dr George Beaton said that “financial metrics are the prevailing norm” in Australia and are an “absolute art form” in the US.

However, these partner profitability measurements have serious shortcomings as comparative metrics, according to Mr Furlong.

“Any law firm that believes its profit-per-partner numbers are an accurate reflection of its health and status within its markets needs an intervention,” Mr Furlong said.

“Partner profitability is an unusual metric to deploy in any event,” he continued. “It's the rare corporation that says to itself, ‘This law firm made more money off its clients than any other. We should pay them to do our legal work’.”

Mr Furlong said other comparative metrics were also of little use to clients because they “tend to be either very narrowly applicable or highly subjective”.

For instance, M&A league tables are a “useful secondary measure” of which firms handle the best deals but it only applies to the “tiniest fraction” of firms, Mr Furlong said.

Rankings systems such as Chambers “and many, many other less reputable versions that purport to rank law firms according to reputation and other criteria according to both peers and clients” are equally limited, he continued.

“If anyone has come up with a reliable measure of full-service law firms' market share across multiple sectors, I haven't seen it,” he said.

He continued: “League tables and ranking systems are entirely reactive and backwards-looking: they tell you what people thought or what decisions they made in the past, but they don't give you any reliable guidance on what firms they should use in future.

“So to the extent there are any metrics to compare law firm performance, they are of interest and utility almost entirely to law firms themselves.”

Dr Beaton agreed that metrics have their limitations but was more optimistic about the usefulness of comparative measurements.

Figures that capture data about client satisfaction, such as Net Promoter Score (NPS) and Overall Client Service (OCS), do discriminate well between firms, he said.

“We think NPS only is too limited,” continued Dr Beaton. “So we collect the NPS and calculate it but we also collect OCS.”

Unlike NPS, OCS measures five dimensions: perceptions of value, propensity to recommend, inclination to re-engage the law firm as opposed to recommend to a friend and the strength of the client’s bond with the firm.

Mr Furlong said in-house counsel often settle on a law firm through personal relationships, inertia and habit rather than through consideration of metrics.

He advised law firms to find a way to insert themselves into the conversation within companies about buying criteria.

“Law firms would be very wise to find out everything they can about these internal conversations,” he said.

“Otherwise, they may find that a decision about their fate was reached without them ever even knowing a discussion was taking place.”

Mr Furlong said the legal industry “absolutely” needs new ways to measure law firm quality.

“But it's an incredibly difficult nut to crack,” he said.

“Until something concrete develops in this area, firms need to remember that it's the client, not the law firm, that gets to decide what constitutes quality, value, and effectiveness.

“So if you don't know exactly what your firm's clients think about how your firm is doing on these three points, pick up the phone today and start finding out.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017


Law firm metrics ‘not much use to clients’
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Animal law moots, advocacy, Melbourne University, Australia and New Zealand Intervarsity Moot on Animal Law
Sep 25 2017
Moot unleashes animal advocacy
Melbourne has played host to one of the largest animal law moots, with student participants put th...
Scales
Sep 25 2017
Transgender teens should not need legal approval for hormone treatment, court hears
A transgender 17-year-old known as Kelvin has appealed in the Family Court against the requirement o...
Appointed, Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
Sep 25 2017
NFP CEO appointed Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
The CEO of a Victorian not-for profit pro bono legal services provider has been named as the state...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...