find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Class actions seek overseas funding against big Aussie players

Class actions seek overseas funding against big Aussie players

Stewart Levitt, Levitt Robinson Solicitors

Firms are turning to litigation funders based abroad for class actions against powerful Australian adversaries for fear local players may be pressured into settlement.

In a recent case, Levitt Robinson Solicitors sought out New York funder Galactic Litigation Partners LLC for a class action involving hundreds of sailors against the Royal Australian Navy.

Speaking with Lawyers Weekly, Levitt Robinson Solicitors principal Stewart Levitt (pictured) said that if a party is seeking litigation funding for a class action against an influential Australian entity, there is often concern the adversary will put pressure on a local funder to agree to an unfair settlement.

It’s for this reason that litigation funders based overseas are often sought for class actions against powerful or high-profile opponents.

“There’s a perception here that governments put pressure on lawyers and funders who act for consumers, or the banks do,” Mr Levitt said.

“This is particularly so when you have cases that involve great and powerful adversaries such as the Commonwealth of Australia and, in those circumstances, using a domestic funder who may well be more susceptible to pressure at some level is probably less desirable.”

Mr Levitt explained that overseas funders are less susceptible to Australian organisations and therefore more likely to act independently.

He said another perception is that local litigation funders tend to seek a quick and substantial return on investment.

“Once there's a litigation funder involved [there’s a perception] they're really not interested in justice and that it's in the interests of the funder to get in and out as quickly as possible for the profit,” he said.

“The interests of the litigant can be sidelined in those circumstances, or compromised.”

In the Royal Australian Navy case, Mr Levitt said that a US litigation funder was preferred to allay fears among the sailors that a local funder might be influenced by the potential of backlash from the Australian Government.

The claim alleges the Navy induced hundreds of sailors to sign up for the four-year MT2010 programme, which promised 'on the job' education and training towards a Certificate IV (Engineering) qualification.

According to the claim, this training was not provided as promised and the sailors were effectively "warehoused".


Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Class actions seek overseas funding against big Aussie players
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...