find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
‘Panacea approach' to national exam flawed

‘Panacea approach' to national exam flawed


While a 'catch-all' national exam would help standardise barriers to entry into the profession, a multi-layered approach to training and testing is more effective, Griffith University academics have argued.

Australia does not have an American-style Bar exam for lawyers but federal regulators are looking at this option “very closely indeed” in other sectors, according to Dr Hugh Breakey, a research fellow at Griffith University’s Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law.

Speaking at a symposium, The Future of Modern Professionalism, hosted by UNSW and Allens last week, Dr Breakey said exams often fail to deliver on their promises and could even “make matters worse” in terms of controlling competence and ethics.

The problem, he explained, is that many national exams try to perform too many functions.

Some exams are designed to check whether universities are performing, while others are designed to standardise the educational and training institutions or provide an alternative pathway to becoming a professional, said Dr Breakey.

On the other hand, exams can be used to guarantee minimum standards or can be a gateway to full professional status, he continued.

“These functions can all require different types of exams – and that's important,” he said. “We need to be very wary about the exam as panacea approach.”

While a regulator may be able to group one of two of these functions together, exams cannot be appropriately timed and pitched to test everything at once.

“You need to be clear about what you are trying to achieve with the positioning of the exam,” he said.

Another issue with placing too much emphasis on a national exam is that it is a blunt instrument for solving the issue of falling standards, according to Dr Breakey.

“Exams might fix the problem of competence but fail to deal with the problem of ethics,” he said.

Also speaking at the symposium, Professor Charles Sampford, the director of the university’s Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, said it was “foolish” to try to teach ethics through an exam.

“Ethics is not just a matter of knowledge and it’s not just a matter of right or wrong,” he said.

“I think most lawyers would agree that it is a matter of good judgement, not just right and wrong answers.”

Ethics is also “contextual” and has to be integrated into everyday practice, according to Professor Stampford.

Dr Breakey said a national exam should be a strategic part of the broader, multi-layered “integrity system” to ensure high standards, which includes university assessments, practical training and smaller exams.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

‘Panacea approach' to national exam flawed
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...