find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Panama Papers spark call for money-laundering crackdown

Panama Papers spark call for money-laundering crackdown


In the wake of an unprecedented data leak from a Panama law firm, the government should consider cracking down on corporate service providers, including lawyers acting in that role, a legal academic has said.

A data leak of more than 11.5 million documents from Panamian law firm Mossack Fonseca & Co exposed hundreds of cases where shell companies may have been misused, with more than 800 Australian clients, Russian President Vladimir Putin and many others potentially implicated.

University of Sydney associate professor and practising lawyer David Chaikin suggested the leak highlighted the extent to which tax havens could be used to hide personal wealth.

In response, he called for the government to extend its anti-money laundering regime by creating an obligation for corporate service providers and other professionals to report suspicious transactions.

“Governments both Labor and Coalition have long failed to effectively apply Australia’s anti-money laundering laws,” Dr Chaikin said.

“The Panama Papers should encourage the government to apply Australia’s laws to corporate service providers that deal with tax havens on behalf of their clients.”

Dr Chaikin argued this obligation should not apply to lawyers, given the special relationship between lawyers and clients.

“I must say that it's difficult to reconcile the idea that you can be a client of mine and I would report a suspicious transaction,” he said. “I think that's irreconcilable with the fundamental duties that a lawyer owes to their client.”

However, he suggested where lawyers act as corporate service providers – as in the case where lawyers primarily set up trusts or structures for third parties – they should fall under the same obligations as a non-lawyer doing that work.

“If a lawyer is engaged in certain business activities, if they're a corporate service provider, then they should be [subject to the obligation],” he said.

In the case of Panama, the law firm allegedly has a particular arm that was charged with setting up tax structures on behalf of clients, work which Dr Chaikin believes can be “distinguished from normal legal transactional work”.

“If essentially what you're doing is providing companies and trusts for third parties, the reason or justification for excluding lawyers doesn't apply to that type of business activity,” he said.

He also warned that lawyers as a group are being used as an excuse by the government not to extend the regime to other professionals.

The roots of this issue extend to the introduction in 2006 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Act, which brought in an obligation for banks, financial institutions, brokerage and insurance houses and casinos to report suspicious activity.

The initial plans were for the obligation to be extended in 2008 to lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, precious minerals dealers and corporate service providers – but the legal profession lobbied against the changes and they were never introduced, Dr Chaikin said.

“The justification for excluding lawyers from the obligation still applies, but it never was a justification for not applying the law to other relevant professions or corporate service providers,” he said.

“So why hasn't the government applied the law to these other groups?

“The government should not be able to hide behind the fact that they can't apply it to lawyers as an excuse not to apply it to the others.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Panama Papers spark call for money-laundering crackdown
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...