find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
LCA opposes Australia-China extradition treaty

LCA opposes Australia-China extradition treaty

China

The Law Council of Australia has questioned whether the proposed Australia-China Extradition Treaty is in Australia’s national interest due to China’s lack of procedural fairness.

Earlier this week the Law Council of Australia argued against the ratification of the Australia-China Extradition Treaty in a public hearing of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties Inquiry into the proposed Treaty on Extradition Between Australia and the People’s Republic of China.

"The treaty omits a common safeguard in Australia's extradition treaties to ensure protection of an extradited person's right to a fair trial, namely the ability to refuse a request where extradition would be 'unjust or oppressive'," Law Council of Australia president Stuart Clark AM said.

"Unless these concerns are addressed, the Law Council opposes the ratification of this treaty."

Mr Clark said there are reports that China does not act in accordance with procedural fairness and the rule of law standards in criminal proceedings.

"Numerous expert bodies, including the UN Committee Against Torture and the US State Department, have recently expressed strong concerns about the ability of China to provide a right to a fair trial for those charged with criminal offences or prevent the torture of prisoners," Mr Clark said.

Mr Clark said this raises questions about whether the proposed treaty is indeed in Australia’s national interest.

"International extradition serves an important function in allowing states to cooperate, respect each other’s sovereignty, and ensure that criminals are not able to evade justice," Mr Clark said.

"However, there is an important national interest in ensuring that the administration of justice accords with fundamental rule of law principles and human rights obligations."

The Law Council’s concerns include limited protections for the right to a fair trial, limited evidentiary thresholds for determining an extradition request, presumption against bail and absence of limits for executive decision making.

Also, consequences for breaching an undertaking that the death penalty will not be imposed, insufficient protections for children, inadequate monitory systems and China not being party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The Law Council of Australia has made a written submission to the inquiry with a number of recommendations aimed at improving the safeguards in the proposed Australia-China Treaty and extradition regime.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

LCA opposes Australia-China extradition treaty
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...