find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Legal bodies raise alarm over police powers bills

Legal bodies raise alarm over police powers bills

Controversial new bills to increase police powers in NSW have been met with opposition from the state’s legal bodies.

Yesterday, the NSW Parliament passed two bills granting new powers to state police, one related to public safety orders (PSOs) and another to serious crime prevention orders (SCPOs).

The Law Society of NSW warned the bills may target organised crime but can be used against a broad range of individuals, including those not charged with an offence.

President Gary Ulman said the bills were the latest in an ongoing trend of encroachment on individual rights and liberties in the state.

"The first of these bills allows for ‘serious crime prevention orders’ to be issued against a broad range of individuals – which could seriously impact individual freedoms," he said.

The second, he continued, would allow police to issue "public safety orders" preventing individuals from attending specified venues, with breaches punishable by a maximum prison term of five years.

"This significantly expands police powers, including warrantless search powers in some circumstances,” he said.  

"I am concerned and the community should also be concerned about the extension of executive – and therefore unelected – powers proposed by the bills, which could erode long-standing rights including the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, the right to property, and the right to be protected against double punishment."

In submissions released this week, the NSW Bar Association has described the proposals as unconstitutional and an unnecessary threat to both individual freedoms and the rule of law.

The power to implement PSOs will lead to the “arbitrary and excessive interference” with individual liberty and freedoms, the Bar Association said, “irrespective of whether [a person has] committed or is likely to commit a criminal offence”.

“The powers to constrain freedom of assembly, association, expression and movement to be conferred on police are sweepingly broad, and not subject to any substantial legal constraints or procedural safeguards, and subject to flawed and legally objectionable oversight in which there are inherent elements of unfairness," it added.

“The bill represents a significant encroachment on freedoms of assembly, association, expression and movement, based upon the satisfaction of a senior police officer – and in the case of urgent orders, any police officer, potentially a probationary constable.”

According to the NSW Bar Association, no case has been made by the government to answer why such powers should be conferred on the police “at all”, particularly in light of declining crime rates in NSW.

Furthermore, there has been no public debate about the bill or explanation as to why such “broad and far-reaching powers should be conferred on the police”, the association said.

The NSW Bar Association raised special concern for the “exceedingly low threshold” used to determine who or what poses a ‘serious risk’ under the legislation.

The submission also flags the scope for urgent orders to be conveyed verbally, that PSOs can target children and persons with impaired intellectual functioning, and that in many cases there is no means of knowing the police basis for making a PSO as problematic.

“The NSW Bar Association opposes the bill. As with the SCPO Bill, the NSW Bar Association is concerned at the manner in which a bill with such serious implications for the liberties of persons in NSW was introduced in Parliament.

"It occurred without any prior consultation with appropriate legal professional bodies, law reform agencies or civil liberties organisations.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Legal bodies raise alarm over police powers bills
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...