find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Multiplex won’t open litigation floodgates

Multiplex won’t open litigation floodgates

AS LAW FIRM Slater & Gordon investigates claims that construction giant Multiplex may have misled investors, a leading partner at the firm has rejected claims that Australia is about to be…

AS LAW FIRM Slater & Gordon investigates claims that construction giant Multiplex may have misled investors, a leading partner at the firm has rejected claims that Australia is about to be hit by a flood of litigation of this sort.

There is greater awareness than there was five years ago of the opportunities for shareholder class actions, according to Slater & Gordon partner Lisa Nicols. “There are bodies who actively advance the interests of shareholders and raise awareness, such as the Australian Shareholders Association,” she said.

But Nicols rejected the predictions of some analysts that there will be a flood of litigation, claiming that this is just “scare mongering”.

“I think that the disclosure provisions of the corporations law are there for a purpose and if shareholders take action to effectively enforce those, then that is completely consistent with the public policy of the corporations law. But actions will only be run when they are viable. These actions are expensive and challenging so it is wrong to think that just because some actions have been run on a non-disclosure basis there will be dozens or hundreds of them.

“It really will depend on whether companies are complying with their obligations and what happens as a result because, of course, some non-disclosures are not material,” Nicols said. “Sometimes they don’t affect the share price. I would say that the number of cases being brought is not likely to increase exponentially.”

The firm is investigating on behalf of former and current Multiplex shareholders who suffered significant losses when the company’s share price plunged this year. “Late last year, Multiplex was still indicating publicly that the Wembley project was on track to return a large profit,” said Nicols. “But then in February Multiplex announced that the Wembley project would break even instead of making a profit and in May Multiplex announced that in fact the Wembley project would return a 45 million pound loss,” she said.

Nicols said it needs to be asked “what Multiplex management knew and when”. Allegations made publicly suggest Multiplex has some explaining to do, she added.

Shareholder actions are not a new concept in law, but there have not been a significant number in Australia. Slater & Gordon, along with other firms, regularly receives calls from shareholders when shares have plunged and they think there is a reason to be suspicious or that the company has not disclosed information.

Slater & Gordon is currently acting for about 1,500 shareholders, in the case of Ion. “That company has gone into administration so the process in that case is engaging in the filing of the proof of claim, rather than issuing proceedings, but it is a similar concept,” Nicols said.

“That has the legal issue of whether shareholders can recover as creditors. But, it is nevertheless similar to the Multiplex issue — the question is whether the company properly disclosed the things it ought to have disclosed under the corporations rules.”

This area of shareholder action against companies is about disclosure, said Nicols. “So it’s whether the companies comply with their continuous disclosure obligations, which means in essence that when there is something that has a material effect on a share price, and it comes to the company’s attention or should have been known by it, it must be disclosed.

“Those roles are refined somewhat when a company is issuing a prospectus and more generally there are a range of statutory prohibitions against misleading conduct. It is about what companies do say, and also what companies don’t say and should have said,” she said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Multiplex won’t open litigation floodgates
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...