find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Driverless vehicle regulation called for

Driverless vehicle regulation called for

cars

Australian governments must establish a proper legal and regulatory framework for a future road transport environment of driverless vehicles, according to a new report from a national firm.

Clayton Utz’s recently released report Driving into the future: Regulating driverless vehicles in Australia calls for changes to existing laws and the introduction of nationally consistent regulations to assist in the transition to a world where driverless vehicles are the norm.

“It's not an easy exercise, as the regulatory environment for the use of motor vehicles in Australia is complex,” said Owen Hayford, Clayton Utz partner and one of the report's key authors.

“The National Transport Commission has already undertaken some valuable work in identifying regulatory barriers for automated vehicles and options to address these.”

He continued: “Our report seeks to build on that and identify some of the key areas that legislators and regulators can start looking at now to ensure a clear and consistent approach to issues such as liability and, at a federal level, minimum safety design standards.”

Mr Hayford suggested that addressing the key legal risks and uncertainties in a phased manner would help maximise the potential benefits of driverless vehicles, such as reduced road fatalities and congestion.

He also said we can learn from those already embracing driverless vehicles.

“Australian companies such as Fortescue Metals Group and Caterpillar are already leading the way in the application of automated and driverless vehicle technology in their industries,” Mr Hayford said.

“We can draw on their experiences and lessons learnt to inform a best practice legal framework as driverless cars become mainstream.”

Mr Hayford suggested that the first step would be to create a safe environment for the testing of vehicles on public roads.

“South Australia has made changes to its laws to facilitate such testing but on a case-by-case basis. Making it easier for manufacturers to carry out public road testing could see Australia become one of the first countries in which driverless vehicles are widely deployed,” he said.

“This would facilitate not only early access to the road safety, productivity, mobility and other benefits that driverless vehicles offer, but also facilitate the local development of associated industries and know-how that can be exported around the world.”

Commercial litigation partner Greg Williams, who also contributed to the report, said liability and associated insurance arrangements would be two of the key issues to consider.

“One of the big questions is, 'Who should be legally responsible for the automated driving system if it infringes road rules or causes an accident?',” Mr Williams said.

“One of our recommendations is that the concepts of ‘driver’ and ‘proper control’ as currently defined by the Australian Road Rules and related laws be clarified to smooth the path for conditionally automated vehicles, and ultimately reviewed to take into account the operation of highly and fully driverless vehicles.”

Other legal issues to consider, according to Mr Williams, include data privacy and cyber security.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Driverless vehicle regulation called for
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...