find the latest legal job
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Arncliffe NSW 2205
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
4+ PAE Commercial Lawyer - Contract Role (Maternity cover)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· 4+ years PAE · End-to-end deal carriage
View details
Partners and Senior Specialist Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Australia
· Earn 70% of billings and fixed referral incentives · Full practice flexibility & freedom
View details
Lawyers to succumb to 'inevitable' consumer platform

Lawyers to succumb to 'inevitable' consumer platform

Internet of Things

Law firms will soon be forced to adapt to make way for an emerging risk that is set to shake up the traditional nature of legal practice, a partner has warned.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly, Gilbert + Tobin partner Peter Leonard said the internet of things will give lawyers “no choice” but to change the way they deliver legal services to clients.

The internet of things (IoT) is a network of physical devices, vehicles and buildings that are embedded with electronic software, sensors and connectivity capabilities that enable them to collect and exchange data.

“The internet of things is the description that people are giving to the new use of the internet, to enable devices to talk to other devices,” Mr Leonard said.

“Typically, it will be a device which senses environmental conditions in a home or in an electricity or gas network. That sensor device sends information back to a data analytics platform or to a human carrying a smartphone, which then works out what decisions should be executed based on what the sensor is showing.

“There’s a wide range of internet of things starting to emerge, ranging from swimming pool management services, to services that help a farmer determine how much water to put where in a paddock, or how much fertiliser to use and so on.”

Mr Leonard said the IoT presents significant challenges to legal professionals.

“I think probably the main challenges are around privacy management, because many of the early IoT deployments have been devices which use personal information,” he said.

“The next range of issues starting to come through is around the legal liability for decisions that are made by machines, or using information collected through censored devices.

“One of the factors that make this area very complicated is that many of these new services will involve a number of providers working together …The IoT is really about interconnectivity of devices and decisions being made with minimal human intervention, so sometimes when things go wrong, they can go catastrophically wrong.”

Mr Leonard noted that, as with many digital disruptors, there is currently not enough governance around the IoT.

“Things can go wrong because certain information was either not received when it should’ve been received because some other device broke down, or because the information that was received was wrong because a human had put the device in the wrong place or had turned the device off,” he said.

“In essence, the problem is one that comes naturally with interconnectivity of a lot of devices doing things with minimal human intervention. It’s problems that arise through unclear delineation of who is responsible for what when this many parties are involved.”

Mr Leonard said a good example is autonomous cars.

“Let’s assume that an autonomous car is programmed to recognise something that looks like a human and to then make a decision to avoid that human, but as a result hits something that looks like a dog but is in reality a pram with a child,” he said.

“There are those kinds of difficult decisions that are inherent to the programming of many IoT services, and just how the law will deal with those issues is something that needs to be worked through.”

Despite these challenges, Mr Leonard said the IoT also presents unique opportunities to lawyers.

“The IoT is inevitable and will deliver us a huge range of benefits,” he said.

“It’s a question of getting the balance right and lawyers helping businesses to understand both the risks and opportunities so that consumer trust in the IoT can be built.”

Mr Leonard said while he expects lawyers who specialise in private litigation to feel the impact of the IoT the most, he anticipates all lawyers will eventually be affected.

“An area that will quickly emerge as an issue in the use of IoT data is private litigation,” he said.

“For example, if you put together mobile phone tracking information with Fitbit information, with toll device information, you can have a pretty complete view of the movements of an individual by vehicle and by foot and that might become quite powerful evidence in criminal proceedings, perhaps even in family law proceedings.

“So I think that lawyers will be coming across the IoT regardless of whether they’re technology lawyers or not, because the IoT will generate such a range and depth of information that will affect many areas of law.”

In conclusion, Mr Leonard said the IoT should not be feared by lawyers, but embraced.

“Much digital disruption in the legal profession is really around finding ways to deliver a more commoditised end of legal services so that the business of law can still be properly conducted but by a more efficient delivery of services at reduced costs,” he said.

“I think we will see the IoT increasingly disrupting other businesses that are not initially anticipated as disruptable.

“Legal disruptors are disrupting the legal profession but IoT might be used to disrupt it in ways that we can’t even anticipate today.”

Like this story? Read more:

Book commemorates diamond milestone for WA law society

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

Lawyers to succumb to 'inevitable' consumer platform
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Jan 17 2018
Lawyers lash out over latest Dutton attack
A number of legal bodies have condemned federal home affairs minister Peter Dutton’s latest commen...
Car crash, driverless cars
Jan 17 2018
Driverless cars a privacy car crash in the making
The testing of driverless cars on Australian roads has presented a new challenge, with serious conce...
new role with SA judicial appointment, scales of justice
Jan 15 2018
Worker's comp expert takes on new role with SA judicial appointment
An Adelaide barrister has been appointed deputy president of the South Australian Employment Tribuna...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...