find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Debate over need for international commercial court in Aus

Debate over need for international commercial court in Aus

While some have called for the introduction of an international commercial court in Australia as an alternative form of dispute settlement to international arbitration, the chair of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre feels it is unnecessary.

Earlier this year Victorian Supreme Court Chief Justice Marilyn Warren AC and Justice Clyde Croft said the need for an Australian international commercial court is growing as more free trade agreements come to fruition.

During Hong Kong International Arbitration Week 2016 earlier this month, the Hong Kong Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen SC endorsed Australia as a suitable jurisdiction for the development of arbitration, as well as an international commercial court.

“I heard that Australia is thinking of setting up an international commercial court,” Mr Yuen said.

“I think that would be one possible alternative to develop the arbitration and I’m sure people will have every confidence in the judges of Australia.”

However, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre chair Teresa Cheng told Lawyers Weekly she doesn’t think an international commercial court is necessary in Australia.

“This idea of an international commercial court starts actually with the concept of one country, two systems,” Ms Cheng said.

She explained this using the example of the first international court to be established.

“It started very much with Dubai. Dubai set up their Dubai International Financial Centre as a ‘building’ whereby if the contract is signed there you will be subject to common law and not Dubai law.”

Ms Cheng said it’s important to consider why a jurisdiction like Dubai needs two systems.

“I think there are reservations about the Dubai legal system and in light of the development of business, instead of just relying on Islamic law and Dubai law, they said ‘Let’s have common law because financial businesspeople are familiar with the common law’,” she explained.

“So therefore that was set up. That was the first international court, as it were.”

Other jurisdictions with international commercial courts, such as Qatar and Abu Dhabi, need them because the local law is unfamiliar to the international business community, according to Ms Cheng.

“So does Australia need it?” she said. “I doubt it, because Australia has a sound commercial law background already.”

“Your judgments are very, not all of them, dare I say, but a large number of them are very well reasoned. So do you need to set up something to show that you in fact are not confident about the rest of your judicial system and laws? I would think not.”

Ms Cheng went on to discuss the reasoning behind the recent introduction of the Singapore International Commercial Court.

Ms Cheng believes it is a marketing ploy and an attempt to gain attention, rather than a genuine provision of options for parties.

“I always question why did Singapore have to set up a separate ICC? I asked that question to the Singaporeans and nobody answered me properly, they only say that it's a choice to the parties. But it’s marketing,” she said.

“You don't create something and make a name for it so that you get talked about.”

Coming back to Australia, Ms Cheng concluded: “I probably would think you would not want to be seen to be like places which need a separate forum because you don’t trust the rest of your law or your judiciary.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Debate over need for international commercial court in Aus
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...