find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Firm responds to discrimination allegations

Firm responds to discrimination allegations


Maurice Blackburn has responded to claims that it unfairly discriminated against one of its now former lawyers, who is taking the firm to the Federal Circuit Court on this argument.

Originally reported in The Australian Financial Review, Cairns-based will disputes lawyer Louisa Young said she is taking Maurice Blackburn to the Federal Circuit Court, arguing that the firm discriminated against her on multiple occasions because she is legally blind.

Ms Young told the AFR that in August 2016 she sat down with Andrew Simpson, national head of Maurice Blackburn’s will disputes team, and Gemma Davidson, the firm's Queensland HR manager, and was told she was an “unacceptable risk to the business because of her disability and her duties needed to be changed accordingly”.

Ms Young claimed that after the meeting she was given a demotion that “limited her career prospects as a solicitor”.

Adding to this, Ms Young told the AFR that in October 2016 she was discouraged from renominating herself for an external work committee on the grounds that it was business development-focused and her new role did not involve business development.  

According to the AFR, Ms Young said she would renominate for the committee as she felt it was an important aspect of her ongoing career development, however was found to have engaged in misconduct last month because she disclosed these plans.

Ms Young also claimed that her supervisor and Maurice Blackburn senior associate, Naomi de Costa, said in December 2015 that she was required by the firm to have a carer with her at all external work-related events, according to the AFR.

However, at the firm’s Christmas party, Ms Young’s carer had to leave the event early. Ms Young claimed she had arranged for another Maurice Blackburn employee to support her when required for the remainder of the party.

According to the AFR, Ms Young claimed she was verbally reprimanded” by Ms de Costa for not leaving the Christmas party when her original carer left.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly on behalf of the firm, a Maurice Blackburn spokesperson said it “disputes the allegations”.

“This is a confidential matter, which we attempted to resolve as quickly as possible for all employees concerned,” the spokesperson said.

“This included ensuring an independent process from the outset, with every support offered as required, to thoroughly address concerns raised and to seek a resolution. Regretfully, however, the firm had no option but to terminate Ms Young’s employment in December 2016.

“While it is not appropriate to be drawn on the specifics, our firm maintains its longstanding commitment to treating all staff fairly.”

Ms Young has reportedly asked the firm for an injunction to allow her to rejoin the committee, as well as a pecuniary penalty. Ms Young allegedly also asked for compensation from Maurice Blackburn for distress, hurt, humiliation and psychological injury.

This matter comes after WA Deaf Society CEO Rebecca Adam called out Australia’s legal profession for being “discriminatory” and “contradictory”.

Ms Adam is second-generation deaf and told Lawyers Weekly that she has been discriminated against by firms due to her disability, despite having been a qualified lawyer for over 20 years.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Firm responds to discrimination allegations
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...