find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Barrister faults the Corporations Act

Barrister faults the Corporations Act

A NEW South Wales barrister has stumbled on what appears to be a loophole in the Corporations Act that has for years been causing trouble for lawyers that want to keep their clients happy. As a…

A NEW South Wales barrister has stumbled on what appears to be a loophole in the Corporations Act that has for years been causing trouble for lawyers that want to keep their clients happy. As a result, a Supreme Court judge has called on the government to look closely at the current law.

For years it was thought that when a creditor makes a successful application to the Court to wind up a company and is successful, the creditor’s legal costs are paid. In fact, said Geoff McDonald, barrister and managing partner of Hall Chadwick, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of New South Wales has clarified an anomaly in the law that means those costs are not to be paid.

It is a mistake in the Corporations Act, McDonald told Lawyers Weekly. “When creditors are chasing money they are owed, and there are hundreds of these every day, the substance of the application may be successful but because of the loophole they don’t get their legal costs paid,” he said.

Under the Corporations Act, the legal costs of making an application to the Supreme or Federal Court are payable if the company is liquidated. “In fact, these costs are paid before the liquidator’s fees. They usually approximate $5,000 to $10,000 but can easily escalate in contested cases,” said McDonald.

For years these legal costs have been paid by liquidators in priority to all other creditors, McDonald said. But Paul Fordyce, partner of PMF Legal and director of Insolvency Notices, and McDonald recognised a growing incidence of these costs being awarded when the law needed clarification.

In McDonald v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation 2005, the judge found that there was a loophole in the law and said that these legal costs are no longer payable, said McDonald.

“The Court held that, when an application is made but the company is liquidated through a Voluntary Administration, the legal fees have no priority and in fact do not have to be paid by the company,” he said.

According to University of Melbourne Faculty of Law professor Ian Ramsay, there is a significant point in this case that does represent a gap in the law. “The judge is right to draw the Parliament’s attention to it,” he told Lawyers Weekly.

The gap works to the disadvantage of creditors, who are not paid in certain circumstances, said Ramsay. McDonald added that although it is unlikely to affect lawyers’ pay, it will affect their clients.

“The effect of this decision is to unfortunately result in the creditor missing out on its legal fees. As a result, it is likely that more negotiated settlements will occur where part or all of those costs can be recovered by the creditor,” McDonald said.

“Clearly, the law needed clarification and needs amending. This case run by PMF Legal and my company has enabled the judge to call for legislative reform.”

Costs are expensive, said Ramsay, and there is a “tremendous amount of insolvency litigation”. “The way forward now is for the Government to consider the comments of the judge in this case,” he said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Barrister faults the Corporations Act
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice, ALA, right-to-die law
Oct 24 2017
‘Right-to-die’ laws would be a relief for terminally ill: ALA
The passage of an assisted dying bill through the lower house of Victorian Parliament has been haile...
Oct 24 2017
Diversity top of agenda for future WA Law Society president
The advancement of diversity in the Western Australian legal profession will be one of the key items...
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...