find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Legal inquiry to divulge evidence ‘mess’

Legal inquiry to divulge evidence ‘mess’

FORMING A united front, Australia’s state law reform commissions have launched what is being touted as the most significant legal inquiry ever conducted in this country. A joint consultation…

FORMING A united front, Australia’s state law reform commissions have launched what is being touted as the most significant legal inquiry ever conducted in this country.

A joint consultation paper entitled Review of the Evidence Act 1995 looks at the harmonisation of evidence regimes across Australia. The introduction of a single set of evidence laws, applicable throughout the country, would avoid confusion as well as reduce legal costs for business, the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) said in a statement in December 2004.

The inquiry will also examine legal professional privilege, the ‘hearsay rule’ and its many exceptions, and the impact of evidence laws on vulnerable witnesses, ALRC president Professor David Weisbrot said.

It is time that the federal Evidence Act was passed, Weisbrot said, arguing a previous ALRC inquiry should have expedited this process. Parallel legislation has already been enacted in New South Wales, the ACT, Tasmania and Norfolk Island, but the other states and territories have evidence laws of their own.

The review will be conducted cooperatively by the ALRC, the NSW Law Reform Commission, the Victorian Law Reform Commission and the Tasmanian Law Reform Institute.

The existing Evidence Act regulates the way evidence is collected, presented and evaluated in criminal and civil court proceedings. The rules of evidence contained in the Act are therefore central to the operation of the entire Australian justice system.

“In some states, lawyers need to be skilled in at least two different evidence regimes — and more importantly, it is unnecessarily complicated for litigants and costly for business,” Weisbrot said. “Companies have to contend with different rules on such important matters for business as clients’ legal privilege and the storage and maintenance of corporate records.”

And, depending on where a case is being heard, the case will have to be prepared and presented differently if litigation is required. “Anecdotally, commercial litigators seem to favour operating under the Evidence Act regimes, and file accordingly,” Weisbrot said.

Associate Professor Les McCrimmon from the University of Sydney, also a new ALRC commissioner, said many legal professionals believe the sections of the Evidence Act relating to client legal privilege were in urgent need of reform.

“At the moment, in jurisdictions where the uniform Evidence Act operates, the common law rules apply in pre-trial evidence gathering processes such as discovery and subpoenas, but the Evidence Act applies during the trial itself,” McCrimmon said.

There is a strong feeling, he suggested, that there should not be two sets of laws applying concurrently to client legal privilege and “that the Act requires urgent reforms”. “There are significant differences between the common law and the clients’ legal privilege sections of the Evidence Act,” McCrimmon said.

The issues paper summarises the existing evidence regimes in Australia, outlines the areas under review and seeks submissions from interested parties by 18 February this year.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Legal inquiry to divulge evidence ‘mess’
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...