find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Judges condemn Hulls’ plan for Victorian judiciary

Judges condemn Hulls’ plan for Victorian judiciary

THE VICTORIAN Government faces a revolt by judges over its plan to appoint acting judges to make the state’s court system more flexible and efficient, and to release a backlog of cases said to…

THE VICTORIAN Government faces a revolt by judges over its plan to appoint acting judges to make the state’s court system more flexible and efficient, and to release a backlog of cases said to be clogging up the system.

Legislation introduced into the Victorian Parliament this year would allow the State’s barristers, solicitors and legal academics to take short-term appointments as acting judges.

However, a leading national judicial body, the Judicial Conference of Australia (JCA), has decried the proposal, arguing that there is “a substantial body of opinion” in the Australian judiciary that the notion of acting judges is inconsistent with the principle of judicial independence.

The JCA has released a copy of a letter from Justice Ronald Sackville, JCA chair, to Attorney-General Rob Hulls declaring that Victorian judges and magistrates have expressed their opposition to the proposed legislation.

Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) president Chris Dale said there is a common cause for concern expressed by the judiciary, the Victorian Bar and the LIV. “All raise concerns about the appointment of acting judges,” he said.

While the JCA acknowledges that the legislation of the states and territories allows the appointment of acting judges, it argued the proposed Victorian legislation “appears to go well beyond the practice in other Australian jurisdictions”.

The legislation may “pose a significant threat to the principles underpinning judicial independence even if one accepts the proposition that the appointment of acting judges, of itself, does not necessarily threaten judicial independence”.

Through the organisation, Australian judges take issue with the proposal to appoint acting judges for a term of up to five years. Other jurisdictions, the JCA argued, “limit the term of appointment to a maximum of six or twelve months”.

“This reflects the obvious legislative intention that acting judges should be appointed only to deal with particular listing difficulties and, even then, only for a short period,” wrote the JCA in its letter to Hulls.

Dale said earlier this year that the notion of appointing judges for six months raises the issue of independence.

“If the appointee wishes to be extended in office or reappointed later then they are sitting up there making decisions conscious of the fact that they may need to be consistent with government policy,” he said.

Dale also had concerns about using acting judges as a solution to long-term problems. “They may have a place to cure temporary issues,” Dale said, but the court backlog is not going to be cured by a “temporary fix” such as this.

In order to remedy the acute problem of the backlog of cases, according to Dale, the appointment of acting judges will do little compared to the appointment of permanent judges.

In its letter to Hulls, the JCA raised the concern that the institution of acting judges could be used as a means of assessing the suitability of candidates for judicial office. “Might there not be a perception, for example, that the Government was assessing the attitudes of an acting judge towards sentencing?”

“If an acting judge under consideration for a permanent appointment decided a controversial case in favour of the Government, might there not be a suspicion in some quarters, however ill-founded, that the decision was influenced by a desire to secure the permanent appointment?”

Dale last week recommended deferring this issue where no real detriment will be caused by further consideration of it. Temporary problems could be cured by the use of acting judges, he said, “but this is not so acute that there could not be some deferral of this important matter so more detailed consideration could be given of it”.

An extract of Justice Sackvilles letter appears on page 10.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Judges condemn Hulls’ plan for Victorian judiciary
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...