find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Incompetent jurors spark reform debate

Incompetent jurors spark reform debate

A SENIOR New South Wales judge last week called for the introduction of majority verdicts after a specified period of deliberation, arguing it is necessary to avoid a jury being “hamstrung…

A SENIOR New South Wales judge last week called for the introduction of majority verdicts after a specified period of deliberation, arguing it is necessary to avoid a jury being “hamstrung by a perverse, disinterested or unreasonable, or simply incompetent juror”.

In a speech on the future direction of criminal law, Justice John Dunford of the NSW Supreme Court spoke about the importance of juries, which he believes are a “bulwark against the exercise of arbitrary power by a corrupt or politically motivated judiciary — not that such is a problem in this country”.

“The jury system can be a check on unpopular laws,” Dunford said. “It is of the essence of a democracy that decisions (whether political through the ballot box or judicial through the jury system) are shared amongst the community as a whole, rather than being limited to the exercise of power by a few elite,” he said.

Justice Dunford told the 2004 Criminal Law Conference in Sydney that despite his support for the jury system, he thought there were some reforms that could make it more efficient.

The proposal presently before the NSW Government for 11-1 majority would be effective when one juror is holding the decision back because of incompetence or disinterest, Dunford said.

“Bear in mind that the judge often knows the voting figures in the hung jury situation because it is at times included in the note he or she receives from the jury, although such figures are not disclosed to counsel,” he said.

Another possible amendment, Dunford suggested, “is that where a jury is unable to agree between conviction on a more serious and a lesser offence… the judge should have the power to enter a conviction for the lesser offence”, he said.

Justice Dunford said that one of the greatest threats to jury trials is the “ever growing length of the average jury trial”. This is due in part to the increase in scientific and technical evidence, the length of recorded interviews, the length, which is often unnecessary, of cross-examination and the length of the summings up, which are “getting longer and longer”.

Additionally, the law should be amended so that an appeal court could allow a verdict if it is satisfied of the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. “This would, I believe, further reduce the number of retrials, without resulting in the conviction of an innocent person,” he said.

If incremental changes, such as those Dunford suggested, do not satisfy the community, “pressure may build for more radical changes such as the abolition of juries, having the judge take part in the jury’s deliberations (which I understand is the case in some European countries), the abolition or modification of the adversarial system, mandatory sentencing, or having the jury involved in sentencing”, he said.

Justice Dunford said he did not see these as immediate threats, but suggested that some may be “lurking below the horizon”.

“The crucial question is would they effect any improvement on the present system, which would be at least debatable, and in some cases, I believe, positively disastrous,” he said.

“I suggest we should not be afraid to take part in a debate about how the system can be improved,” he concluded.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Incompetent jurors spark reform debate
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...