find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
LCA “heartened”: Hicks may come home

LCA “heartened”: Hicks may come home

THE FEDERAL Government has decided to amend legislation in order to recognise the verdicts of US-style military commissions, but appears to have given up on efforts to bring two detainees back…

THE FEDERAL Government has decided to amend legislation in order to recognise the verdicts of US-style military commissions, but appears to have given up on efforts to bring two detainees back to Australia to stand trial.

The decision to amend the legislation marks a positive change for Australian Guantanamo Bay detainees David Hicks and Mamdouh Habib, according to the Law Council of Australia, as it offers hope that they will be returned to their families in this country.

The changes to theinternational transfer of prisoners legislation recognise the verdicts of US-style military commissions and are welcomed by the Law Council, despite previous accusations that Hicks would not receive a fair trial under a military commission.

Last week, possibly spurred on by Britain’s success in securing the release of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, opposition leader Mark Latham urged the Government to make retrospective legal changes to enable the two men to return to Australia for trial. But Prime Minister John Howard rejected the proposals.

As reported by Lawyers Weekly at the beginning of this month, the Law Council condemned the US military commission and claimed that Hicks should receive a fair and just trial in the US before either a civilian court or a court martial. The argument was fuelled by Hicks’ US military lawyer Major Michael Mori, who supported the claims.

The Council remained firm on this matter, maintaining that the military commission “erodes the common rights: which an accused is entitled to in normal criminal proceedings in Australia and the US”.

But Law Council president Bob Gotterson QC said the Council supported the intention to allow Australian detainees Hicks and Habib to return home “if they are sentenced to a term of imprisonment by US authorities”.

The Council has declared its preference that Hicks and Habib serve any military commission-imposed prison sentence in Australia, “and does not oppose moves to achieve this”, Gotterson said. “Indeed, we are heartened that this legislation may offer some hope to the families of the two men,” he said.

His comments follow Hicks’ US Marine Corps lawyer Michael Mori’s comments that Hicks could be tried just as validly in Australia as in the US. Mori said that Hicks had not injured Americans so if he was on trial for violating international laws he could be tried in his own country.

Hicks’ Australian lawyer Stephen Kenny warned last week that if Australia failed to protest against the latest US proposal for the Guantanamo Bay detainees it could put its nationals at risk of indefinite detention elsewhere in the future.

Shadow Attorney-General Nicola Roxon had, prior to the recent changes, accused the Australian Government of doing less for the two Australian detainees than it would do for people held for drug matters in a Thai prison. The Government appeared to be “unmoved” by the fact that neither man had yet been formally charged, she said.

She condemned the Government’s response to Major Mori’s suggestions that his client would not receive a fair trial under a US military commission. The Government should be arguing that Australian citizens are entitled to a fair trial, Roxon said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

LCA “heartened”: Hicks may come home
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...