find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Human rights election promise reminder

Human rights election promise reminder

ELECTION PROMISES are easily made, but the Australian Human Rights Group (AHRG) is determined that the Federal Government’s commitment to a national consultation on human rights will not be…

ELECTION PROMISES are easily made, but the Australian Human Rights Group (AHRG) is determined that the Federal Government’s commitment to a national consultation on human rights will not be easily forgotten.

In a formal letter to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Attorney-General Robert McClelland, the AHRG has set out a framework for a democratic consultation process, one that would provide “an opportunity to discuss our common values and articulate a shared vision”.

This is the second letter the AHRG has sent to the Federal Government in two months, but the organisation, made up of more than 20 community law and human rights groups, has yet to receive a formal response from the Government.

Phoebe Knowles, a Minter Ellison solicitor currently on secondment at the Human Rights Law Resource Centre (HRLC), said the second letter is an important reminder for the Government to act on its election promise.

“The desire to send the second letter was to reiterate that, as we move towards the 60th anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights, the Australian Government should act on its election promise and announce a consultation,” Knowles said.

Knowles is confident that the Government will act in accordance with its election promises, regardless of the current economic crisis.

“In addition to the fact that there has been budget allocation, I think the Government takes its election commitments very seriously. I think the Prime Minister is very interested to ensure that his Government is accountable,” she said.

She added that an economic downturn, far from distracting attention from the issue, would make human rights even more important to protect the rights of the economically disadvantaged.

“The economic change will certainly require that the Government look at prioritising how the Australian economy should respond, however that shouldn’t mean that this election promise is forgotten, nor does it mean that human rights are any less important … this consultation shouldn’t slip off the radar because there’s a change in the global economy.”

Knowles envisages that a full consultation would take between six and nine months and would be an apolitical process.

“It should enable Australians to consider the protection of human rights without the heat of a political debate or a party political dispute,” she said.

“I think the Labor party has been very aware of that and is very wise in their decision to avoid announcing whether they are in favour of or against — pending the outcome of any consultation.”

However, an entirely apolitical process seems unlikely; Shadow Attorney-General Senator Brandis has already publicly criticised the proposed consultation process when speaking to students at the James Cook University Law School in August: “While the Budget announcement stipulated that the money is to be used for ‘national public consultations’, I fear that it will only be used to assist to make the case for a bill of rights, and the case against a bill of rights will fail to receive the public attention that it deserves,” he said.

However, Knowles believes Senator Brandis’s stance is not necessarily reflective of views among his fellow party members. “Even though Senator Brandis put forward his position, it’s not necessarily a view that has been endorsed by the leader of the Opposition,” she said.

Similar human rights consultations have already been held in the ACT, Victoria, Tasmania and Western Australia. The results in those states showed a preference for better rights protections, particularly for marginalised and disadvantaged Australians.

“In the Victoria consultation there was an 86 per cent majority in favour of better protections, and 94 per cent once you counted standardised submissions and postcard submissions were also included,” Knowles said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Human rights election promise reminder
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...