find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Real Estate & Projects Lawyer (6+ years PAE)
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Top tier firm with offices nationally · High profile clients
View details
Simply the best: more incentives needed for judiciary

Simply the best: more incentives needed for judiciary

A recent paper by the President of the American Bar Association, entitled ‘Op-Ed: Judicial Nominations: Time to Turn Down the Heat’, brings into sharp focus the challenges of attracting the best…

A recent paper by the President of the American Bar Association, entitled ‘Op-Ed: Judicial Nominations: Time to Turn Down the Heat’, brings into sharp focus the challenges of attracting the best people to judicial office.

As two of Australia’s preeminent High Court justices enter retirement, the attractiveness of a judicial post is something that many eminent lawyers must have been considering in recent months.

But according to the American Bar President, beyond the intricacies of the judicial appointment process, more weight must be given to the practical considerations of providing incentives such as job satisfaction, work-life balance and comparative remuneration for practitioners at the top of their professional game.

Thomas Wells Junior, President of the American Bar Association has penned an op-ed which highlights the gap between the prestige of judicial nomination, and the day-to-day reality of the arduous process of selection.

“Imagine being recruited for a job that pays well below others in your field, requires an interview process that is likely to lead to public attacks on your intelligence and character, and offers no assurance when, or if, you will be hired. Even in today’s tight market that sounds like a hard sell.”

Despite the constitutional differences between the US and Australian judicial appointment process, the lengthy consultation process and intense public scrutiny surrounding judicial appointments has clear parallels with the Australian system of appointments. The impending retirement of Chief Justice Murray Gleeson resulted in months of speculation about potential candidates for the post of Chief Justice, which went to outsider Justice Peter French.

“It’s not fair to ask our best and brightest to be nominated, and then leave them in limbo for endless stretches of time. And it’s not reasonable to try to run our courts without enough judges. To remedy this growing problem, judges who plan to step down be sure to announce their plans well in advance so their replacement can be readied, and the president and Senate should act promptly to fill vacancies,” Wells said.

Other aspects of the judicial selection are also singled out for critique by the Bar Association President, particularly the shortage of judicial candidates. He criticized the pay scales of judicial office, a debate that has also been ongoing in Australia, particularly in regard to superannuation entitlements for same-sex partners of judicial officers.

“Finally, while many people are struggling financially today, few of us have jobs where we go for years without even the most modest pay raise. But judges do. The women and men who agree to sit on the bench are truly doing it to serve our justice system, and not to get rich, but their compensation lags so far behind that of lawyers in private practice it’s no wonder that many of them are forced to leave. In fact, in the past 15 years, judges have lost more than 12 percent of the purchasing power of their salaries.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Simply the best: more incentives needed for judiciary
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
Applauds
Aug 21 2017
LCA applauds proposed Modern Slavery Act
The Law Council of Australia has welcomed new recommendations for the development of a Modern Slaver...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...