find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Ombudsman scrutinies NSW FOI regime

Ombudsman scrutinies NSW FOI regime

THE NSW Ombudsman, Bruce Barbour, last week released a public discussion paper as part of his review of the state’s freedom of information regime (FOI) which began in April this year.NSW is…

THE NSW Ombudsman, Bruce Barbour, last week released a public discussion paper as part of his review of the state’s freedom of information regime (FOI) which began in April this year.

NSW is following in the bold footsteps of the Queensland Government, which recently announced sweeping changes to its FOI regime after accepting almost all the recommendations put forward by an independent review panel.

The paper describes the NSW Freedom of Information Act (1989), which has been amended more than 60 times, as “unwieldy and difficult, confusing and frustrating for both applicants and participants”. Further, it acknowledges that the subsequent introduction of additional legislation also governing aspects of FOI has made the system even more uncertain and confusing.

One of the issues the paper canvasses is exemptions and the use of “public interest” test. Currently, NSW FOI legislation contains 39 exemptions set out in 26 clauses, eight of which contain a public interest test. The paper raises the question of whether NSW should go down the same route as Queensland and replace these with a single, overarching public interest test that applies to all information, with factors for and against disclosure set out in the legislation.

In addition, the paper notes that the number of exemptions to the FOI regime is constantly growing — even though some of them are rarely, if ever, used — and asks if the number should be reduced.

The paper also specifically looks at the issue of cabinet exemptions which it recognises are “particularly contentious in their interpretation and operation”. The NSW cabinet exemption applies to documents that in some way concern any deliberation or decision of cabinet. As the paper notes, this is broader than the Victorian and Commonwealth equivalents, which only exempt documents that disclose any actual deliberation or decision of cabinet. In addition, the precise scope of the NSW exemption is also still unclear — at times it has been interpreted quite narrowly to only include documents created during or after cabinet deliberations (in an attempt to prevent the exemption being abused), and at times more broadly. The Ombudsman questions whether the exemption should be narrowed in a similar manner to the Victorian exemption, and its scope clarified.

Other matters examined in the paper include the suitability of the current system of fees and charges for FOI requests, the requirement for government to proactively publish information through statements of affairs, and the number and type of bodies exempt from the FOI regime.

The Ombudsman will accept submissions to the paper until 31 October 2008.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Ombudsman scrutinies NSW FOI regime
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...