find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Employers in the firing line

Employers in the firing line

SENIOR EXECUTIVES are becoming more assertive when it comes to challenging employment terminations, and courts are becoming increasingly willing to award them compensation.According to Jamie…

SENIOR EXECUTIVES are becoming more assertive when it comes to challenging employment terminations, and courts are becoming increasingly willing to award them compensation.

According to Jamie Robinson, a partner at Harmers Workplace Lawyers in Brisbane, senior executives who believe they’ve been unreasonably dismissed are now more willing than ever to put up a legal fight.

“There’s [now] less of a stigma attached to it,” he said. “Particularly in NSW, senior executives are openly seen in the media to challenge their termination if they think they’ve been terminated in a way that’s unfair. In some quarters it’s almost seen as a badge of honour that you’ve actually stood up for your rights.”

And on a practical level, Robinson explained, being terminated can have serious financial repercussions, particularly as alternative positions become scarcer.

“People build their lives around their level of income, so, therefore, when they feel they’ve been hard done by they need to potentially protect that lifestyle. Also with the changing economy, it’s probably a bit more difficult now to move on,” he said.

According to Robinson, courts are now finding avenues for compensating senior executives whose salaries would otherwise put them over the remuneration cap for unfair dismissal claims.

One such case was that of Goldman Sachs JB Were Services Pty Ltd v Nikolich [2007] FCAFC 120 in which the Full Federal Court upheld a decision by Justice Wilcox that certain terms of a grievance policy given an employee when he began his employment, formed part of his contract of an employment.

Goldman Sachs, the court found, failed to comply with the grievance policy which led to the employee, Nikolich, suffering psychological shock and his employment being terminated. Goldman Sachs had therefore breached Nikolich’s employment contract and was liable to pay him some $500,000 in damages.

Another developing avenue for redress is based on the recognition by courts of an implied term of “mutual trust and confidence” in employment contracts.

“It’s an adoption of a concept that’s been used, and is quite widely accepted in British law, and that’s that the obviously the employer has to be able to have trust and confidence in the employee, but equally, the employee has to have trust and confidence in the employer,” Robinson explained.

“It’s something that the Australian courts have been reluctant to give heed to, up until Workchoices came through.”

One such case where this avenue was utilised was the case of Russell v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney & Anor [2007] NSWSC 1. Here, The Roman Catholic Church terminated the employment of Mr Russell, a choir master, after allegations of misconduct regarding issues of child protection were made against. The criminal charges against Russell were dismissed, but the church — based on its own investigation — decided to terminate his employment anyway. Russell brought an action against the church claiming that his termination was unreasonable and Justice Rothman of the NSW Supreme Court agreed. Justice Rothman held that an employment contract would be unworkable without an implied term of “mutual trust and confidence”, and in this case, the Church had breached it.

“It almost gives [senior executives] a quasi-unfair dismissal claim,” Robinson said. “It’s definitely something with avenues for growth. It will depend to a degree on what the Labor government does with its laws coming forward as to how vigorously lawyers explore that avenue.”

Obviously this new genre of claims creates significant risks for employers, particularly because they concern senior executives who are often on considerable salaries. According to Robinson, mitigating these risks is a three-stage process — planning, risk assessment and risk management.

In terms of planning, Robinson said, employers need to start paying more careful attention to the details of their employment contracts, “because employers — despite the fact that they’re employing very expensive assets in the firm of people — are very lax in the way they deal with their employment contracts.”

The employment contract takes on particular importance in the case of senior executives who won’t have access to unfair dismissal claims, Robinson explained, because the contract can comprehensively define the grounds on which the employer is able to terminate employment.

In addition, Robinson said, employers need to tread carefully during the entire recruitment process, taking into consideration the terms of any policies documents given to employees and statements made in the interview process.

“[Employers should] not offer things that they’re not going to live up to, which is what a lot of employers do just to get people through the door without recognising that they can be used against them as terms of the contract,” he said.

If an employer is in the position where they want to terminate the employment of a senior executive, they first need to undertake a process of risk assessment and risk management in order to minimise the chances of disputes later on.

“Look at what was said to the person during the recruitment stage, look at the contract and look at what the policies say,” Robinson explained. “If you’ve got performance management policies which aren’t expressly excluded [from the contract] then you’re in a situation where you need to do performance management.”

An alternative to going through what can be a lengthy performance management process, Robinson explained, is to offer the employee additional payment as an acknowledgment that the policy hasn’t been properly complied with. They then need to have the employee sign a deed of release acknowledging the agreement.

“And employers do that. A lot of them recognise that they haven’t done [the performance management process well] … so they’re willing to offer a bit of money in order to get that certainty, as opposed to taking the risk [of the employee later bringing a claim].”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Employers in the firing line
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...