find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Push for dedicated Costs Court in Victoria

Push for dedicated Costs Court in Victoria

VICTORIA HAS laid down the groundwork for the first dedicated Costs Court in Australia, a move that legislators hope will reduce the burden on the lower courts and improve the efficiency of…

VICTORIA HAS laid down the groundwork for the first dedicated Costs Court in Australia, a move that legislators hope will reduce the burden on the lower courts and improve the efficiency of costs rulings.

Amendments to the Legal Profession Act 2004 propose to expand the membership of the Legal Costs Committee (LCC) to include nominees of the Chief Justice of the County Court, and Chief Magistrate and the President of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).

The bill also moves to expand the statutory scope of the LCC to include an advisory function regarding inter-jurisdiction issues affecting the resolution of costs disputes.

Both Victorian Attorney-General Rob Hulls and President of the Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) Tony Burke have put their weight behind the proposed Costs Court, believed to be the first of its kind in Australia.

“The formation of this new Costs Court to handle costs disputes between legal practitioners and clients will promote greater consistency across the jurisdictions and is part of the larger aim of the Brumby Government to streamline case management and improve the efficiency of our courts,” Hulls said.

The LIV has taken credit for the initiative, which was recommended to the Attorney-General’s department by former LIV president Bill O’Shea several years ago.

“We are delighted that it has now come to fruition and we obviously take some credit for the initiative in the first place and we think this is a first for Australia,” commented current President Tony Burke.

“The benefits, as we see it, are that we will now have some degree of specialisation. We think that over time there will develop a body of specialist expertise in the Costs Court that will free up judges and other court officials to do what they are best qualified to do, which is preside over cases rather than to trawl through the minutia of cost disputes.”

In relation to costs complaints against solicitors, the new costs court will have jurisdiction to deal with cost disputes between solicitors and clients that exceed the set statutory limit.

Burke was keen to emphasise that client lawyer disputes are not the sole target of the revised legislation.

“This is not just about complaints against lawyers — this is also in relation to disputes between litigating parties. If you are involved in a civil claim and you receive an award of costs, if the parties can’t agree on the measure of those costs then it will have to be determined by a court.”

The changes flow on from other recent initiatives to modernise the Victorian Courts, including the renaming of Masters as “Associate Judges”. The legislation drafted follows recommendations made by Crown Counsel Dr John Lynch following his review of the Office of Master/Costs Office.

The Bill was introduced into Victorian Parliament on 19 August. It provides for the Costs Court to sit as part of the Trial Division of the Supreme Court.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Push for dedicated Costs Court in Victoria
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
Dec 14 2017
Punishing offenders twice pointless, politicians warned
The president of the Law Society of NSW has warned legislators from other states about adopting cont...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...