find the latest legal job
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Arncliffe NSW 2205
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
Senior Property Lawyer I Commercial Litigator
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Rapidly growing law firm, working with a highly experienced team in a high growth industry across all areas of property and strata law
View details
4+ PAE Commercial Lawyer - Contract Role (Maternity cover)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· 4+ years PAE · End-to-end deal carriage
View details
Partners and Senior Specialist Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Australia
· Earn 70% of billings and fixed referral incentives · Full practice flexibility & freedom
View details
Opposition makes case against bill of rights

Opposition makes case against bill of rights

Shadow Attorney-General George Brandis has outlined the Federal Opposition's key arguments against a bill of rights. Speaking at the Queensland Law Society's 47th Annual Symposium in Brisbane…

Shadow Attorney-General George Brandis has outlined the Federal Opposition's key arguments against a bill of rights.

Speaking at the Queensland Law Society's 47th Annual Symposium in Brisbane last Saturday, Brandis emphasized that the debate about a bill of rights is not about whether human rights should be protected in Australia, but about what is the most appropriate means of doing so.

Brandis said that the opposition has two main criticisms of the Government's proposed statutory bill of rights -firstly, that a bill of rights is not the most effective mechanism for protection human rights, and secondly, that it would lead to a "fundamental rebalancing" of the constitution away from parliament and towards the judiciary, "with dangerous consequences for both".

Specifically, Brandis argued that human rights would be better protected in specific statutes which set out detailed rights in particular cases and area accompanied by enforceable remedies, as opposed to being expressed more generally, with the details left to be nutted out through judicial interpretation.

As an example, he pointed to the suite of amendments made last year to provisions in 84 Commonwealth statutes which discriminated against same-sex couples. "I have no doubt that the rights of those affected are on a much surer footing, having those specific and detailed statutory protections, than they would be were their rights merely dependant on vague, aspirational statements in a bill of rights, unaccompanied by any specific protections or legal remedies," he said.

He also argued that - going by the experience of the UK, Canada and New Zealand - the introduction of a bill of rights would see judges making determinations about issues which are "essentially of a political character, and thus far removed from the orthodox understanding of judicial decision-making".

This is problematic, he said, because of the nature of judicial appointments in Australia, that is, judges are unelected.

"The privilege of making laws lies with those whom the people elect and may dismiss, not with those whom they do not and cannot," he said.

Like this story? Read more:

Book commemorates diamond milestone for WA law society

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

Opposition makes case against bill of rights
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
06:04
Lawyer highlights ‘unintended consequences’ on SSM estate planning
A succession lawyer has warned that the right for same-sex couples to legally marry could have a sub...
drug rehabilitation services available in rural and remote communities
06:02
ALS survey shines spotlight on insufficient rehabilitation services
A new survey posted by the Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) has revealed an alarming insight into ...
Scales of Justice
Jan 17 2018
Lawyers lash out over latest Dutton attack
A number of legal bodies have condemned federal home affairs minister Peter Dutton’s latest commen...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...