find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
ACCC warning on carbon claims

ACCC warning on carbon claims

WITH “CARBON NEUTRAL” the marketing catchcry of the year, competition lawyers will have pounced on the much-anticipated “carbon claims” guide released by the Australian…

WITH “CARBON NEUTRAL” the marketing catchcry of the year, competition lawyers will have pounced on the much-anticipated “carbon claims” guide released by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) last week.

The guide, Carbon Claims and the Trade Practices Act, has been developed to help businesses who make claims about “carbon neutrality” and “carbon offsetting” understand their obligations under the “misleading and deceptive conduct” provisions of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).

Carbon claims are coming under increasing scrutiny from the ACCC, which has already investigated a number of claims by companies. Perhaps the best-known of these is the pending Federal Court action against car manufacturer GM Holden concerning “green” claims used in a marketing campaign for Saab vehicles.

With regard to claims concerning carbon offsetting, the guide emphasises the requirement that the offset be “additional” — meaning that the carbon reduction must not be one that would have occurred anyway.

The guide also specifically deals with forward-credited offsets; that is, offsets that are credited to the buyer immediately, even though the carbon reduction won’t occur until later. Offsets from tree plantations are a prime example of this.

Because of the risk that the carbon reduction from forward-credited offsets may never eventuate, the guide recommends that buyers seek a contractual commitment from the provider that replacement credits will be secured if the offset project falls through. Companies buying forward-credited offsets must also inform customers of the fact that the offsets won’t actually be realised until some time in the future.

No doubt there will be even greater scrutiny of carbon offset claims when the Federal Government releases its national carbon offset standard in December. According to the ACCC, this will set minimum standards for the generation, verification and retirement of offset credits.

In relation to claims of “carbon neutrality”, the guide acknowledges that there’s no standard definition of the term and no definite requirement that all three scopes of emissions must be accounted for. However, it cautions businesses to consider carefully the “overall impression” that use of the term will give consumers, and it directs business to be specific about exactly which scope of emissions and elements of the product lifecycle have been neutralised.

The ACCC is particularly critical of “low carbon” claims — which it describes as ambiguous, broad and meaningless without any context. Again, the guide warns businesses to be specific about the context of the claim, which may require providing a comparison.

It also specifically looks at claims about future performance, such as “going carbon neutral by 2030”. It warns businesses that, if challenged, they will need to be able to establish that they had reasonable grounds for making the claim.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ACCC warning on carbon claims
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...