find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Victoria’s criminal justice IT project blows budget

Victoria’s criminal justice IT project blows budget

IN A report released last week, the Victorian Auditor-General concluded that the Victorian Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Enhancement Program (CJEP) has been implemented over time and…

IN A report released last week, the Victorian Auditor-General concluded that the Victorian Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Enhancement Program (CJEP) has been implemented over time and over budget.

The CJEP is an information and communication technology platform which was designed to streamline the flow of information between key agencies involved in the Victorian criminal justice system. These agencies include the Victorian Police, the Office of Public Prosecutions, Victorian Legal Aid, the County Court and Corrections Victoria.

First given the go ahead in October 1998, the CJEP was allocated a budget of $14.5 million and a deadline of November 2000. However the scope of the project was expanded between 2000 and 2002, which resulted in a budget increase of $15.4 million (to a total of $29.9 million).

But according to the Auditor General’s report, as of March this year the Department of Justice had spent $39.9 million on the CJEP, with an estimated $4 million more to be spent before the project’s completion — a blowout of $14 million above the expanded budget.

On top of this, CJEP partner agencies have incurred about $10.4 million in costs — costs which have not been recorded or monitored by the department — and as of April, the department had spent an another $18 million on maintenance, support and enhancements to the implemented programs.

In addition, the report said that although four out of five components of the program had been completed, the implementation of the electronic brief/disclosure program (called E*Brief) has run considerably over time and is not expected to be completed until 2009.

Victorian Shadow Attorney General Robert Clark has jumped on the report, and said in a statement last week that “it was no wonder Attorney General Rob Hulls has recently been trying to blame lawyers for delays and costs in Victoria’s courts when he has known this damning report was about to be tabled”.

However in response, Victorian Attorney General Rob Hulls has defended the present government, saying that responsibility for the budget blow-out falls on the previous liberal government.

“Many of these scope changes were required because the original planning and budgeting for the project were substantially inadequate,” Hulls said. “The labour government had to rescue a badly planned and inadequately scoped project to ensure its success.”

In the report, the Auditor-General said that the cost blow-out is mainly the result of an underestimation of the complexity, magnitude and level of cross-agency involvement that would be required, an inadequately developed business case, inadequate specification of system requirements and both development and implementation issues associated with contractor performance.

Further, while noting that the CJEP had delivered benefits, the report strongly criticised the inadequacy of the systems in place for measuring these benefits.

“The lack of systematic measurement and reporting of CJEP benefits represents a lack of accountability to ministers, stakeholders and the community, given the importance of CJEP and the extent of public funds invested in its development,” the report states.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Victoria’s criminal justice IT project blows budget
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...