find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Alleged phoenix traders face clipped wings

Alleged phoenix traders face clipped wings

A Sydney-based solicitor and eight company directors have been singled out by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) for alleged phoenix activities. It is alleged that…

A Sydney-based solicitor and eight company directors have been singled out by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) for alleged phoenix activities.

It is alleged that Timothy Donald Somerville, of North Sydney firm Somerville & Co Solicitors, recommended and prepared documents that assisted the directors to engage in phoenix trading, in contravention of the Corporations Act.

Phoenix trading effectively transfers the business or assets of a company in financial distress to another company controlled by the same directors for a negligible consideration.

It is alleged that in each instance the assets of the distressed vendor company were transferred through a sale agreement signed by the same person, as director of both the vendor and purchaser companies. The vendor company was then placed into liquidation after the sale of its assets.

ASIC has also alleged that there was no tangible consideration received from the sale of assets, there were unpaid tax debts and that the businesses continued to operate under the name of the new company.

“Everyone practicing in insolvency knows that phoenix company activity is relatively common,” commented Clayton Utz partner David Cowling.

Cowling pointed to an ASIC study of phoenix company activity in 1996, which found that annual losses to the Australian economy due to phoenix-type activities were estimated to be in the range of $670 million to $1.3 billion (at 1996 values), 45 per cent of phoenix activities appeared to be in the building and construction industry; 77 per cent of phoenix companies did not have adequate books and records; and 77 per cent transferred corporate assets to evade paying creditors.

The survey found that the average phoenix company group generated creditor losses of about $557,000 — which equated roughly to $90,000 per phoenix company group per annum over the average lifespan. The average number of creditors affected by a phoenix company group, again over its lifespan, appeared to be about 838 who lost on average $10,300.

Cowling expressed support for ASIC’s tougher stance on the apparently widespread problem,

“The fact that ASIC has begun this litigation and has announced it in the media is good news. Regardless of the merits (or otherwise) of this particular case, ASIC is sending a clear message to the commercial community and, more importantly, to those professionals who advise phoenix companies,” he said.

“ASIC’s current action appears to be sending a warning to professional advisers (lawyers and accountants) against becoming involved in the planning of phoenix company activities,” Cowling said.

“This represents a new direction — rather than trying to catch phoenix activities after the fact, ASIC is trying to cut off the professional services that support them,” he observed. His observation appears to be backed up by the statement of intent from ASIC which cited phoenix trading as a “significant issue”.

“ASIC has broadened its focus in relation to misconduct to include not only company directors but also others who are involved in, or help facilitate, such transactions”, said ASIC’s Executive Director of Enforcement, Jan Redfern.

ASIC is seeking declarations of contravention of the Corporations Act by the eight company directors and Somerville, injunctions and director-banning orders. Somerville could also face investigation for professional misconduct if a complaint is laid with the Law Society of New South Wales.

The pending civil proceedings will be held in the New South Wales Supreme Court.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Alleged phoenix traders face clipped wings
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...