find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Business confident about Copenhagen

Business confident about Copenhagen

Businesses are quietly confident that the upcoming negotiations at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen (COP15) will be successful, but believe that the US Government's…

Businesses are quietly confident that the upcoming negotiations at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen (COP15) will be successful, but believe that the US Government's position is the biggest hurdle the talks face, according to a recent Norton Rose survey.

An overwhelming 72 per cent of respondents to The Hopes for Copenhagen survey - which canvassed the opinions of 114 individuals involved in the environmental, sustainability and climate change issues in their business -believe the negotiations will result in a "compromised success".

However, not everyone is convinced - with a sizeable 26 per cent of respondents saying they believe the negotiations will fail.

Interestingly, the majority opinion stands in contrast to the view of Allens Arthur Robinson partner Grant Anderson, who told Lawyers Weekly on Wednesday that the successful negotiation of a legally binding agreement at Copenhagen would be "impossible" (see story).

Meanwhile, the importance of the outcome of Copenhagen was almost universally accepted by survey respondents, with 94 per cent saying the negotiations could have a "significant" or "very significant" effect on combating climate change. Further, 60 per cent of respondents felt climate change should be a more significant priority than the global economic crisis, and 79 per cent of respondents said that an unsuccessful outcome at Copenhagen would have a detrimental effect on business.

Businesses were also overwhelmingly positive about the prospect of a move to a lower carbon economy, with 96 per cent saying they believed there were business opportunities in their country as a result of the drive to reduce emissions, and 92 per cent seeing business opportunities within their own organisations.

When it came to the major obstacles the negotiations face, the US stood out as the recalcitrant child, with 70 per cent of respondents saying that the US Government's position on the negotiations was the most significant barrier to an agreement being reached.

Anthony Hobley, head of Norton Rose's climate change and carbon finance team, said that the overriding insight gained from the survey was that those tasked with leading the Copenhagen negotiations were not sufficiently consulting with the private sector, which will ultimately fork out much of the cost of tackling the issue.

"If an agreement, in whatever form, post Copenhagen is to be successful it will require the private sector to provide up to around 85% of the funds necessary to tackle climate change," he said.

"Whilst business is committed to combating climate change, the negotiators are not adequately engaging with them to ensure the regimes that result from the negotiations are sufficiently attractive to private sector finance. It is therefore imperative at this stage to listen and actively involve business in the negotiating process.

"Without the business community mobilising sufficient funds any agreement will not be capable of being effective and the necessary global reduction in emissions will not be achieved".

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Business confident about Copenhagen
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...