find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Mallesons leads on internet law future

Mallesons leads on internet law future

Mallesons Stephen Jaques has acted for Mantra Group, Australia's second largest accommodation provider, in a landmark case which finally clarifies the law in relation to internet marketing and…

Mallesons Stephen Jaques has acted for Mantra Group, Australia's second largest accommodation provider, in a landmark case which finally clarifies the law in relation to internet marketing and trademarks.

The Federal Court found Stephen Andrew Grant and Tailly Pty Ltd (the respondents) guilty of establishing misleading websites to attract bookings for their accommodation business, which used Mantra's trademarks, with the aim of confusing consumers.

"It was a fascinating case to be involved in because it involved previously unrecognised internet marketing issues," Mallesons partner John Swinson told Lawyers Weekly.

The respondents, who rented and sublet 39 rooms in the Gold Coast's Circle on Cavill building, created numerous websites which incorporated Mantra's trademarks, or variations thereof, to attract holidaymakers.

According to Swinson, many people who booked through the respondents were unaware that they were not booking through Mantra.

"People would book a room at Circle on Cavill, turn up to reception and Mantra wouldn't know anything about them," said Swinson.

"People were getting terribly upset."

And according to Swinson, the Federal Court judgment was very clear and left no room for doubt on whether the respondents' actions amounted to infringement of trademarks.

"No case in Australia has ever looked at how a website is analysed from a trademarking point of view. The judge took a very broad view of this issue and very broad remedies," he said.

"It was a clear win. There was no doubt in what the judge said. We were given every single remedy we asked for. Up until now there was no law supporting this."

The respondents were ordered to transfer to Mantra the registration of their Circle on Cavill domain names and other domain names which resemble the Circle on Cavill trademarks.

"This sets a strong precedent that can be used to help clean up the industry. It sends a message to all the other people doing it."

The Court also granted a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from using the Circle on Cavill and other Mantra trademarks, and ordered them to pay all profits made from bookings sourced via the infringing websites to Mantra.

"We brought this case because people were being misled," said Swinson.

"We now have a clear judgment directly relevant to internet marketing."

- Claire Chaffey

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Mallesons leads on internet law future
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...