find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Axing of Human Rights Act a welcome move

Axing of Human Rights Act a welcome move

Committing to the promotion and protection of human rights without pursuing a Human Rights Act is a welcome move, the chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI)…

Committing to the promotion and protection of human rights without pursuing a Human Rights Act is a welcome move, the chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) has said.

In the wake of a wave of criticism from legal and human rights bodies, the ACCI openly welcomed the Federal Government's decision not to implement a national Human Rights Act.

"Today's decision is well balanced and targets our human rights activities towards areas where a meaningful difference can be made, and away from the legal ambiguities and divisiveness that would have accompanied a Charter or Bill of Rights," said chief executive Peter Anderson.

"A legislative Charter or Bill could have also led to counterproductive or unintended consequences for industry and citizens going about their lawful business and thus impinged on rights that are currently not in contest."

Anderson said the human rights review process had not yielded any compelling reasons for an Act to be adopted, nor provided any evidence that parliament was unable to address perceived shortcomings in the human rights arena.

Anderson also argued that an Act would impede business and potentially create unworkable uncertainty for employers.

"Business requires legal certainty to meet obligations to employees, customers and the broader community. That certainty is compromised by Charters or Bills of Rights open to myriad interpretations and appeals," he said.

The Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) also welcomed the Government's decision, saying the adoption of an Act would merely "hand unelected judges unprecedented power" whilst not actually doing anything to benefit human rights.

"This issue was never about whether human rights should be protected," said managing director Jim Wallace, "but how best to protect them."

"We strongly believe that [an Act] was not the way to go, and that the best way to protect human rights is through specific tailored legislation relevant to the right in question which is debated robustly in the democratic forum of parliament."

ACL did, however, acknowledge that numerous human rights issues in Australia need to be addressed, though was adamant that an Act was not necessary for this to occur.

"We strongly welcome the Government's plan to provide greater parliamentary scrutiny of legislation in terms of human rights, as well as their plan to establish a national education campaign on human rights," said Wallace.

"Australia's free press, parliamentary democracy, common law and independent judiciary have helped ensure Australia's human rights record is the envy of people all over the world. Let's now build on that record to ensure that vulnerable people aren't falling through the cracks."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Axing of Human Rights Act a welcome move
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
07:03
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...