find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Disputed clause could derail commercial arbitration efficacy

Disputed clause could derail commercial arbitration efficacy

President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Derek Minus has disputed a clause in the Commercial Arbitration Bill 2010 which he believes will seriously hamper alternative dispute…

President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Derek Minus has disputed a clause in the Commercial Arbitration Bill 2010 which he believes will seriously hamper alternative dispute resolution processes.

Minus has also alleged that the clause, in its current form, was not contained in the draft Bill provided to key arbitral bodies during the consultative process, and that he was only given a copy of the Bill containing the clause once it had been tabled in Parliament.

Minus told Lawyers Weekly that the heart of the problem lies in clause 27D, which gives parties to a commercial dispute the choice to withhold consent for arbitral proceedings if a mediation or conciliation has been unsuccessful.

"Not to allow an arbitrator to continue with the arbitration after conciliation, without the written consent of the parties, is a retrograde step," he said.

"A private arbitrator, who has often been through a long process of selection, will avoid attempting to conciliate, let alone mediate."

As well as potentially causing significant delays, Minus believes the clause also provides a deterrent to mediation because the confidentiality of matters disclosed during mediation cannot be guaranteed if parties do subsequently go to arbitration.

"In my view, it is going to be a significant problem," he said.

"If the Bill doesn't offer a better process than [what] we have at the moment, then people won't use it. And in my view, it doesn't."

Minus believes that if the Bill is passed without amendment to clause 27D, the outcome will not result in the "cost-effective and efficient alternative to litigation" which NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos has said is his ultimate goal.

"Arbitrators [should] be given the power to order parties to attend mediation or conciliation as the NSW courts are currently able to do so," he said.

Minus believes the past 20 years have demonstrated that without such power, parties are highly unlikely to participate in alternative processes.

"Unless you have the ability to tell people; 'Look, this is really silly, I can see what the major issue is because I'm an expert in this area and we really need to talk about this and get some agreement' it won't work," he said.

If the Bill is passed, the legislation will be applied throughout Australia in a long-awaited "clean up" of the current law.

"For the last 15 to 20 years, arbitrators have been trying to fix [the legislation] but they never got around to doing it," said Minus.

"If we get it wrong now, we could have another 15 or 20 years of trying to fix it."

Lawyers Weekly has contacted the NSW Attorney-General and is still waiting for a response.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Disputed clause could derail commercial arbitration efficacy
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...