find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Middletons-takes-on-quot-aggressive-quot-ATO-

Middletons-takes-on-quot-aggressive-quot-ATO-

In one of the first cases of its kind, the Federal Court has ruled that a company failed to pay income tax because it was poorly run, rejecting an argument by the Australian Taxation Office…

In one of the first cases of its kind, the Federal Court has ruled that a company failed to pay income tax because it was poorly run, rejecting an argument by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) that it was artificially inflating prices.

SNF Australia, represented by Middletons in the decision, was targeted by the ATO after it failed to pay any income tax between 1998 to 2004 after it posted a series of trading losses. This was despite its parent company, the French based SNF Floerger, boasting profits of around 7.5 per cent during that period.

In a hearing before Judge John Middleton of the Federal Court last week, SNF Australia argued that it incurred a trading loss during the review period due to a combination of intense competition, poor management, excessive stock levels and a series of bad debts.

The ATO countered that the company was in fact "a successful and profitable entity during the relevant period", enjoying strong annual sales growth in Australia. It also argued that despite a strong performance in the Australian market and the fact that SNF Australia received significant equity subscriptions and loans from its parent company, it failed to record any profit.

"In our view, this is the first time a Fed Court case [has been heard] on transfer pricing, providing the interaction with the double tax agreement and discussions about what methods are relevant for determining the appropriate transfer price," said Philip Diviny, the head of Middletons' tax and revenue law group.

Diviny acted for SNF Australia in conjunction with fellow Middletons partner Paul Sinn, a commercial litigation specialist.

Transfer pricing is the price that is assumed to have been charged by one part of a company for products and services it provides to another part of the same company, in order to calculate each division's profit and loss separately.

Last year, the ATO was granted extra funding to enforce transfer pricing laws on companies trading over $250 million worth of goods per annum. It also recruited around an extra 60 staff to focus solely on transfer pricing issues.

Judge Middleton accepted that the company's losses were genuine. He found that there could be no inference drawn that the prices were artificially inflated, and that SNF Floerger offered price support to its Australian subsidiary, as it had adopted a long-term view of the company's operations and that initial losses were incurred in every country in which SNF operated.

"The victory SNF Australia has had here will give confidence to taxpayers that they shouldn't feel bulldozed by an aggressive tax office position," Sinn said. "They can go to Court and win."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Middletons-takes-on-quot-aggressive-quot-ATO-
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...