find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
ALA urges Gillard to take moral stance

ALA urges Gillard to take moral stance

Julia Gillard will be making a "morally reprehensible" decision if she chooses to return asylum seekers to regions where death or injury is likely, according to the Australian Lawyers Alliance…

Julia Gillard will be making a "morally reprehensible" decision if she chooses to return asylum seekers to regions where death or injury is likely, according to the Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA).

ALA director Greg Barns said such a policy would be completely unacceptable under international law, and fears Gillard is considering adopting a hard-line policy in order to win the federal election.

"Such action undermines the rule of law and is in breach of Australia's international human rights obligations - most particularly articles 31 & 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention," said Barns, adding that such a decision would also destroy any international humanitarian reputation Australia still holds.

Article 31 of the convention says that parties to the convention cannot impose penalties on refugees, while article 33 states that parties are prohibited from expelling or returning refugees to a place where the refugee's life or freedom would be threatened due to race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion (also known as the principle of non-refoulement).

"The vast majority of asylum seekers who come to Australia are found to fall into one of these categories and so it can be safely assumed that if the Gillard Government was to return asylum seekers to their country of origin they would be jeopardising their lives," said Barns.

"Further, it would mean Australia is morally responsible for the death of people sent back who are later persecuted."

According to Barns, Australia has obligations under international law to prevent people being subjected to torture or cruel and unusual punishment, and sending asylum seekers back to face persecution would be doing exactly this.

"Ms Gillard may be on the back foot because of the way she came in to office, but if she is appealing to the Australian public to judge her on how she does her job, now is the time to show she has some moral and ethical fortitude and do the right thing on this issue," he said.

The ALA has also slammed the Federal Opposition's announcement this morning (6 July) that if they are elected, they will reject asylum applicants who do not have identification documents.

The announcement was made by the Shadow Migration spokesman, Scott Morrison, and is a policy which the ALA says was rejected in 2003 by a Senate Committee which actually included members of Morrison's party.

According to the ALA, the Senate Committee reached the conclusion that a comparable proposal was deeply flawed, accepting evidence from senior migration lawyer and now Chair of the Refugee Council of Australia John Gibson that attempts to deny a person, who cannot produce identification, access to the refugee determination process is wrong in principle.

The ALA said there are myriad examples of people being unable to obtain documentation in their country of origin - either due to the country's lack of sophistication or the fact they are fleeing conditions of persecution - and that the reasons provided by Gibson in 2003 remain valid.

Gillard is due to announce the Labor party's asylum seeker policy later today at the Lowy Institute.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ALA urges Gillard to take moral stance
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...