find the latest legal job
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Glass half full or empty for Corrs and Mallesons

Glass half full or empty for Corrs and Mallesons

The fine of just under $19 million handed to Telstra by the Federal Court yesterday was a victory of sorts for both law firms involved.Mallesons Stephen Jaques acted for Telstra and Corrs…

The fine of just under $19 million handed to Telstra by the Federal Court yesterday was a victory of sorts for both law firms involved.

Mallesons Stephen Jaques acted for Telstra and Corrs Chambers Westgarth acted for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Melbourne-based trade practices and insurance litigation partner Daniel Marquet and Brisbane-based commercial litigation special counsel Frances Williams led the Corrs team.

The ACCC sought a $34 million fine for the telco giant, which said it had not consciously engaged in anti-competitive practices after unwittingly denying broadband competitors access to its telephone exchanges.

Telstra admitted it had breached the Trade Practices Act (TPA) and Telecommunications Act on 49 occasions, however, as no one person is liable for more than one pecuniary penalty, Telstra was only liable to receive penalties with regard to 27 breaches of the TPA, with each separate contravention carrying a fine of up to $10 million.

The ACCC argued that a fine of $40 million was appropriate, with a 15 per cent reduction (bringing the fine sought to $34 million), on account of admissions of breaches by Telstra in the proceedings. This figure was less than 13 per cent of the total maximum penalty, with the ACCC giving regard to the duration of the conduct, whether multiple contraventions arose from the conduct, and mitigating or aggravating circumstances arising from the conduct.

Telstra argued that its total penalty should be a portion of the maximum penalty for a singe breach, namely $10 million, and that admissions of liability and its co-operation in proceedings should mean an appropriate total penalty of between $3-5 million.

Justice Middleton found a $26.5 million fine was appropriate, with a discount of 30 per cent for Telstra's co-operation during proceedings bringing the fine to $18,550,000.

Justice Middleton rejected Telstra's contention that it had only committed "one wrong" and commented that he was not satisfied that Telstra had demonstrated any remorse or appreciated the seriousness of its conduct. He criticised the telco for "failure to specifically express remorse through its counsel", and highlighted previous comments by a manager of Telstra that described the proceedings as focusing on "unimportant" issues.

However, Justice Middleton found Telstra's conduct was not characterised by a deliberately discriminatory approach to access seekers, and that responsibility for decisions in regard to Telstra's exchange access obligations were not well understood within the company. He rejected any suggestion that the contraventions occurred as a result of any implicit or express direction from the then chief executive, and that Telstra's conduct was not deliberately anti-competitive.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Glass half full or empty for Corrs and Mallesons
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Crowd
06:05
Anti-radicalisation programs playing ‘second fiddle’ to terrorism laws
Several academics have questioned the balance between Australia’s counterterrorism legislation and...
 William Ah Ket
06:00
‘Bamboo ceiling’ thought piece wins inaugural law prize
A paper that explores the idea of affirmative action to achieve greater diversity among members of A...
Nov 22 2017
Reduced investment protections will make robust commercial arbitration mechanisms all the more critical for investors
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the current trend away from investor protect...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...