find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
WebCourt: coming to a PC near you

WebCourt: coming to a PC near you

Broadcasting court cases on the internet will be on the Victorian Brumby Government's agenda should it be re-elected in the upcoming state election.According to Premier John Brumby, the idea is…

Broadcasting court cases on the internet will be on the Victorian Brumby Government's agenda should it be re-elected in the upcoming state election.

According to Premier John Brumby, the idea is to give the public a better understanding of the complexities involved in a legal hearing by allowing them to view cases being streamed from the Magistrates, County and Supreme courts.

Brumby said a mix of high-profile and less prominent cases, of which most will be criminal, would be uploaded online - and streamed as "WebCourt" - as determined by the judiciary.

"We're going to webcast the courts," Brumby told Fairfax Radio on Tuesday (9 November).

"You'll be able to tune in, you'll be able to see the court proceedings, you'll be able to see the defence, you'll be able to see all of that, you'll be able to see the judge ... The intention is to give a fair representation of what's happening in the courts so the public can watch.

"It'll [give] the public better understanding of the complexities of what happens in a court case ... But in turn also I think it'll help make sure judges are more in tune with community attitudes."

However, Brumby said he had not yet discussed the idea with judicial officers.

"There'll be some I guess that might be happy about this, there'll be some that won't."

The Law Institute of Victoria, however, has already expressed its opposition, stating that the $6.5 million the Brumby Government plans to spend on the program would be better spent on legal aid.

"We think it would be better for the government to use this money for legal aid funding," said Steven Stevens, president of the LIV.

"At least one advantage of the proposal might be that the public will see how many people miss out on legal aid now and appear before the courts without a lawyer."

The LIV added that some lawyers have already expressed concern over WebCourt and say careful consideration is needed to ensure the privacy and rights of individuals involved in court cases.

"We oppose it for jury trials because of the potential for identification of jurors, who may be intimidated by fear of retribution; witnesses, whose testimony may be affected; and other parties who may be identified," said Stevens.

"We support it in limited circumstances. We don't want it turning into a Judge Judy-type media circus, like it is in the US. It is not about the personality of prosecutors, defendants or judges. It is about a fair trial and whether it is useful to inform the public about our criminal justice system.

"We support it in sentencing hearings because publicising sentencing would act as a deterrent. It would also help explain the difficult task judges and magistrates have in sentencing and help eliminate ill-informed comments about sentencing which arise from time to time."

Stevens also made the point that the operation of Victoria's law courts was already transparent and accessible to the public.

"There is no real need for WebCourt. Most court proceedings are already recorded and from an educative point of view, the courts are already open to the public. Any interested person can go to court and learn how it works," he said.

"The Law Institute will make its position known to the Government and seek to be involved in making sure WebCourt is implemented appropriately."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

WebCourt: coming to a PC near you
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...