find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Nine-solicitor firm takes on Macquarie

Nine-solicitor firm takes on Macquarie

Levitt Robinson has issued a letter to the Macquarie Bank CEO that foreshadows its intention to include the bank in its ongoing Storm Financial class action.In a "letter Before Suit" that was…

Levitt Robinson has issued a letter to the Macquarie Bank CEO that foreshadows its intention to include the bank in its ongoing Storm Financial class action.

In a "letter Before Suit" that was hand delivered to Macquarie Bank (MBL) CEO Wallace Sheppard on 24 November, Levitt Robinson principal Stewart Levitt claimed that each of his firm's clients have suffered significant losses as a result of the closing-out of margin loans, and that its clients consider Macquarie to be "responsible for them having incurred those losses".

"Each of our clients considers that MBL is therefore liable to them in damages for breach of contract, and further, arising from their conflict of interest in preferring the interests of Storm to the interests of their Storm-referred customers inter alia, for unconscionable conduct," Levitt wrote in the letter to Sheppard.

Levitt told Lawyers Weekly that his firm hopes to have initiated formal legal proceedings against Macquarie by the end of the year, and that his firm's class action might be expanded further.

"We have legal teams working on MBL, CBA, the closure of the fund, in particular whether it breaches s601 of the Corporations Act, and I am preparing a class action against the Bank of Queensland (BoQ)," he said.

The Levitt Robinson missive to the CEO of Macquarie Bank came two days before the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced its intention to take legal action against Macquarie.

ASIC announced it would also commence legal proceedings against the CBA and BoQ, in addition to bringing civil penalty proceedings against Storm directors Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis. ASIC has alleged that both Macquarie and the Bank of Queensland breached contract clauses, engaged in unconscionable conduct and have liability as linked credit providers of Storm under section 73 of the Trade Practices Act.

ASIC has also alleged that the CBA, BoQ and MBL participated in a managed investment scheme with regard to the Storm Model, and were required to be registered under the Corporations Act, something which they did not do.

ASIC has allowed a maximum three week period before it formally files compensation proceedings, to facilitate settlement of this issue.

While Levitt believes ASIC is taking a "softly softly" approach to the matter, he said that the statement by the regulator demonstrates that the resolution scheme negotiated by the CBA and Slater & Gordon in February fell way short of the mark.

"I have been totally vindicated [in instigating a separate class action]," Levitt said. "Slater & Gordon have been rubbishing my action, saying that our whole approach is flawed and that Storm investors should have no confidence in us.

"It is quite flattering that a firm with 750 lawyers would take the time to attack a firm with one principal and nine solicitors."

Levitt said that he would be meeting representatives from ASIC this week and federal parliamentarians in the near future to lobby for increased safeguards with regards to shareholder interests when companies collapse.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Nine-solicitor firm takes on Macquarie
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...