find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Federal Court rules against Hollywood

Federal Court rules against Hollywood

Internet service providers have once again emerged as the winners in the latest battle between internet service provider iiNet and the giants of the Hollywood film industry. This week the Full…

Internet service providers have once again emerged as the winners in the latest battle between internet service provider iiNet and the giants of the Hollywood film industry.

This week the Full Federal Court found in favour of iiNet, dismissing Roadshow Films' appeal against a finding by Justice Cowdroy that iiNet had not authorised copyright infringement.

The landmark case, launched by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) in November 2008 has attracted worldwide attention as content owners and internet users watch closely to see whether ISPs will be forced to do more to prevent their users from downloading content illegally through file-sharing.

The battle began when Hollywood studios - including Roadshow Films, Warner Bros and Twentieth Century Fox - alleged that subscribers or other users of iiNet, used peer-to-peer software (BitTorrent) and iiNet's facilities to download copies of Roadshow's films. They claimed that those films were made available from iiNet users' computers and shared via iiNet's facilities, resulting in an infringement of copyright. AFACT served notices to iiNet which alleged that iiNet's users were infringing copyright.

While dismissing the appeal by a 2-1 majority, the Full Federal Court rejected Justice Cowdroy's finding at first instance - that ISPs are simply a necessary precondition but not the "means" of infringement, and that as a result iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement.

"That blanket defence has been rejected. ISPs can't just say 'we're not the means therefore we avoid liability for infringement'," explained Clayton Utz senior associate, Timothy Webb.

In his judgement Justice Emmett went on to set out the necessary actions of ISPs and circumstances in which it would be reasonable for an ISP to suspend or terminate a customer's account.

"Clear signposts have been given by the court as to what is necessary to constitute authorisation of infringement by an ISP," Webb explained.

"However, in this particular case it was held that the notices and circumstances applying to iiNet were not sufficient [to be] liable for authorisation."

The key points emerging from the appeal, according to Webb, are that there is no absolute defence for ISPs to claims of authorisation; an ISP can be obliged to take action against a customer, including suspending or terminating their account; the content of the infringement notices sent to the ISP is critical and that ISPs need to have good policies in place to deal with repeat infringers.

"The fact that the court was split is an indication of the complexity of this area of law and the uncertainty that has exists today. It's not black and white. These are matters of judgment and turn on the particular facts. So it's a matter of watch this space," Webb said.

The Hollywood studios have until 24 March 2011 to appeal the Federal Court's decision. Representing iiNet in the proceedings, Herbert Geer partner Graham Phillips said although there is some expectation of an appeal to the High Court, there have been calls by iiNet as well as AFACT for a greater focus on resolving issues outside the court system.

"There needs to be more focus on resolving things outside court," Phillips said. "Putting in place regulations and putting things in code and having negotiations to solve things outside the court process."

Herbert Geer represented iiNet while Clayton Utz represented the Internet Industry Association in relation to earlier proceedings commenced by AFACT against iiNet.

Briana Everett

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Federal Court rules against Hollywood
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...