find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
Be gentle with Crown copyright: LIV

Be gentle with Crown copyright: LIV

MAJOR CHANGES to Crown copyright laws are unnecessary, according to the Law Institute of Victoria (LIV). Responding to a request for submissions to the Copyright Law Review Committee’s issues…

MAJOR CHANGES to Crown copyright laws are unnecessary, according to the Law Institute of Victoria (LIV).

Responding to a request for submissions to the Copyright Law Review Committee’s issues paper, Crown Copyright, the LIV stated there could, however, be scope for clarification of where Crown copyright exists.

Prepared in February this year, Crown Copyright asked whether copyright should subsist in government material, in whom it should be vested and under what circumstances.

Options for reform ranged from the abolition of statutory copyright and Crown prerogative (vesting copyright either privately or in the public domain), to its retention, with improved administration.

The Government could also adopt licensing practices or waive copyright in certain circumstances and types of material. However, the Government could also retain copyright but create a special exception to copyright infringement for government material.

The committee highlighted three key issues for members of the legal profession and other interested parties to consider. Firstly, whether the legislative scheme establishing government ownership of copyright was appropriate, and second, whether the government should own copyright in material produced by the executive, judicial and legislative arms of government. Lastly, it asked what options there were for reform, legislative or otherwise, and the costs and benefits of these.

In its submission, the LIV stated that it believed the law relating to government ownership of copyright material in Australia should not be changed in a “wholesale manner”.

It pointed out that the context in which Crown copyright operated was distinct from the operation of commercial copyright. It said the reason for the creation of copyright in a Crown context was to advance a public purpose, including education and information.

On the other hand, the LIV stated, the purpose of copyright in a commercial organisation was focused on sales and making profit.

Also, the LIV did not favour “an exhaustive legislative definition of the Crown, so as to preserve the existing jurisprudence surrounding this concept, and to maintain flexibility”.

The LIV did acknowledge, however, that there was scope for the legislation to “provide greater clarity on what constitutes an instrumentality of the Crown”.

Noting that the line between public and private sector organisations could sometimes be blurred, it argued that “greater guidance should be provided in the form of a list of factors to consider in determining whether a body constitutes an instrumentality of the Crown”.

“Such a list would assist practitioners in determining which side of the line the particular organisation that is being considered falls; that is, is the body an instrumentality of the Crown or not? Such a list should be flexible enough to deal with changes to economic and/or political circumstances,” the LIV said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Be gentle with Crown copyright: LIV
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...