find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Red Cross tackles tough issues at Law Week seminar

Red Cross tackles tough issues at Law Week seminar

The Australian Red Cross took advantage of Law Week to highlight the lack of clarity surrounding laws relating to direct participation in hostilities (DPH).Speaking at a Humanitarian Law…

The Australian Red Cross took advantage of Law Week to highlight the lack of clarity surrounding laws relating to direct participation in hostilities (DPH).

Speaking at a Humanitarian Law Perspectives seminar on Wednesday (18 May) night, Kelisiana Thynne, legal adviser to the International Committee of the Red Cross regional delegation in the Pacific, and Dr Emily Crawford, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Sydney, discussed difficulties surrounding the notion of DPH and how confusion about what DPH actually means can raise legal issues for those involved in armed conflict.

Crawford explained that DPH falls under the banner of international humanitarian law (IHL), which is defined in the four Geneva conventions and their protocols. IHL aims to protect civilians in armed conflict and, as such, combatants must be able to distinguish between other combatants, who may be lawfully attacked, and civilians who are protected under IHL - until, that is, they engage in DPH.

According to Thynne, the lack of clarity surrounding the meaning of DPH is topical because of the rising number of civilians killed in combat.

"There have been so many instances of civilians being killed in battle, and many allegations that certain governments may be targeting civilians and not directing their attacks towards the correct military object," she told Lawyers Weekly.

Crawford said the reasons behind this include the fact that modern warfare has evolved from a situation where the enemy is easily recognisable, especially in international conflicts, to one in which the distinction between enemy and civilian has become increasingly blurred. In addition, civilians have also become more involved in activities that could constitute actual combat.

In May 2009, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) published an interpretative guide about what constitutes DPH, but there is still uncertainty surrounding the law and a dearth of practical applications.

According to Thynne, one way for the law to be more clearly defined in this area would be for a court, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), to tackle the issue in official proceedings.

"There haven't been any test cases so far, but I think the ICC might take [the issue] into account in the future," she said.

However, as is the enduring challenge of international law, Thynne said that even this would not guarantee an accepted narrowing, or otherwise, of the definition of DPH.

"A judgment dealing with the issue of DPH would certainly help, but whether the US and other large armies would take the court's definition into account is another matter, because it is not necessarily binding on them," she explained.

"But if a decision was taken domestically that happened to deal with this particular issue, then it would certainly help to develop the law. We would hope that the ICRC's interpretative guidance would be taken into account, but you're never really sure what the judge might take into account. They might come up with their own completely different interpretation."

The Humanitarian Law Perspectives seminars are held regularly and are sponsored by Mallesons Stephen Jaques.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Red Cross tackles tough issues at Law Week seminar
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...