find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
New firm offers new approach

New firm offers new approach

A new boutique law firm is challenging the traditional barrister-solicitor model by providing a unique consultancy service to other law firms.Solicitor Justeen Dormer and former barrister…

A new boutique law firm is challenging the traditional barrister-solicitor model by providing a unique consultancy service to other law firms.

Solicitor Justeen Dormer and former barrister Stephanie Fendekian opened Dormers Commercial Lawyers & Consultants in Sydney last month with a vision to provide a commercially attractive alternative to law firms for advocacy and related expertise.

In addition to working with clients of Dormers Commercial, Fendekian will provide specialist litigation and dispute resolution services to other law firms who retain her.

“Law firms can engage me as a consultant on terms that are not only aimed at being commercially attractive for the client, but also for the law firm," said Fendekian.

Fendekian will provide essentially the same services which she provided at the bar, but said there will be a lot more flexibility as to the terms of the retainer. This will allow firms an opportunity to gain some leverage in their practice - something she said is a "non-option" on the conventional solicitor-barrister disbursement model.

"I can be engaged in different ways, for example I could work a day a week at a law firm on a variety of different matters as an alternative to engaging a particular barrister on a particular matter," said Fendekian.

Fendekian, who has 10 years experience at the Bar in Sydney, said she wanted to explore what she saw as a "niche opportunity" to provide this service after listening to her solicitors over many years.

“I have heard solicitors express concern about having to explain to clients the need to brief barristers. Many clients don't understand why their law firm is unable to provide a full litigation service and many don't understand why they are receiving a solicitor’s invoice and a barrister’s invoice," she said.

By engaging her services, law firms will be able to market themselves to their clients as providing advocacy and specialist litigation expertise in-house, as a way of distinguishing themselves from competitors, said Fendekian.

Under the new model, clients will also be able to contact Fendekian directly (if the law firm want this), something she said is another break with convention, where clients rarely see or talk to their barrister without their solicitor.

"It annoys clients, because the rates are so high now as it is, when they perceive that they are basically paying a solicitor to pass on a message and have the same conversation they could have personally themselves at half the price. They just don't get it, and I understand that," said Dormer.

Fendekian also hopes to aid in early dispute resolution by providing an independent opinion about the merits of cases, especially as this is now required before proceedings can commence in the Federal Court, and from October in the State Courts.

“Hopefully law firms will have a bigger incentive to get me involved sooner rather than later. This will enable me to offer some stewardship early in a dispute rather than, as often happens when you’re at the Bar, getting the brief once the matter has considerably progressed,” said Fendekian.

Stephanie Quine

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

New firm offers new approach
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 22 2017
‘Document tsunami’ driving lawyers to upskill in TAR
A prominent Victorian judge has highlighted the growing need for lawyers to expand their knowledge o...
Defamation expert appointed to lead Victorian Bar
Nov 22 2017
Defamation expert appointed to lead Victorian Bar
The Victorian Bar has named Dr Matt Collins QC as its new president, with an additional eight member...
Law Council of Australia
Nov 21 2017
LCA calls for urgent adoption of ‘game-changing’ recommendation
The Law Council of Australia has urged for the immediate adoption of a key recommendation put forwar...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...