find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Don't change Migration Act: ALHR

Don't change Migration Act: ALHR

The Federal Government should process asylum seekers onshore and not change legislation to accommodate offshore processing, according to the president of Australian Lawyers for Human…

The Federal Government should process asylum seekers onshore and not change legislation to accommodate offshore processing, according to the president of Australian Lawyers for Human Rights.

Stephen Keim SC said that in light of last week's landmark decision by the High Court, which ruled the Government's so-called Malaysia Solution to be invalid, and the advice of the Commonwealth Solicitor-General released earlier this week, onshore processing should now be the preferred option.

"Onshore processing is the legally certain, least expensive and most humane and principled way ahead for determining asylum-seeker claims," said Keim.

In the High Court decision handed down on 31 August, the Malaysia Solution was deemed unlawful as it did not provide adequate protection to those being sent to Malaysia.

In welcoming the decision, Keim said its significance lay with the fact that it "casts substantial legal uncertainty on a 10-year policy that has been proven to be morally deficient and economically wasteful".

He also said that given the High Court's reasoning, it is unlikely that any of Australia's neighbours - with the exception of New Zealand - would be suitable for processing Australia's asylum seekers.

"The fact remains that Australia, notwithstanding the shortcomings in its own approach to asylum seekers, is in the best position to meet its freely undertaken obligations under international law to ensure adequate human rights protections to people while they are pursuing their legitimate right to seek asylum from persecution," said Keim.

Keim also cautioned the Government against resurrecting the Nauru and Manus Island processing and detention - neither of which has been scrutinised by the High Court. Keim added that even though Nauru has recently acceded to the Refugee Convention, questions remain as to whether its domestic protections would satisfy the criteria under s198A of the Migration Act.

In discussing people smuggling, Keim said the efforts to address it should be centred on strategies that are truly regional in nature.

"These strategies should maximise disincentives for people to seek the services of people smugglers, thereby exposing themselves to the attendant risks. These strategies should at the same time respect and protect the rights and interests of refugees and asylum seekers," he said.

"The resettlement component of the Malaysia Agreement and the commitment of Australia and Malaysia to improve the quality of protection for refugees and asylum seekers in Malaysia are the sorts of steps that would need to be part of a well thought out regional approach."

Keim urged the Government not to be tempted to undermine the High Court's decision through any "quick-fix" legislative tricks, and said any attempts to "by-pass" the decision would likely end up before the courts and further delay the development of a constructive and effective asylum seeker policy.

Keim also said any such moves would reflect poorly on Australia as an international contributor to addressing the global refugee protection deficit.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Don't change Migration Act: ALHR
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
06:03
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...