find the latest legal job
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Goldilocks solution key to lateral hiring strategy

Goldilocks solution key to lateral hiring strategy

Law firms with a conservative lateral hiring strategy tend to be more successful than their more active or minimally-active direct competitors, according to new research from the UK. As a follow…

Law firms with a conservative lateral hiring strategy tend to be more successful than their more active or minimally-active direct competitors, according to new research from the UK.

As a follow up to research conducted earlier this year into 1,944 partner moves in London across a five-year period, Motive Legal Consulting has conducted new research to determine the extent to which lateral partner hiring delivers value to law firms and the most appropriate strategy to do so.

Recognising that law firm development is affected by a multiplicity of factors, the research report maintains that lateral partner hiring continues to be the "main perceived engine of law firm growth", with almost every law firm in the UK market having a dedicated strategy to hire partners.

With a serious degree of attrition amongst lateral partner hires in the UK - a rate of 33 per cent after three years and 44 per cent after five years - the research sought to uncover the financial value to firms.

"It stands to reason therefore, that these programmes must be presumed to be having some effect to law firm financials over time. Otherwise, why do it?" said Motive Legal Consulting's Mark Brandon.

Released in October, the new research examined the same data set of 1,944 lateral partner hires from July 2005 and July 2010. The research focused on six pairs of London law firms, which were chosen based on a number of criteria, including similar size, similar strategy/focus, similar geographic location/spread, similar revenues per partner, no major mergers during the five-year period, and differing lateral hiring strategies.

Comparing large, city-based international firms, national firms, city-based sector-focused firms, independent city-based firms, Scottish firms and midtown firms, the research concluded that "the best hiring strategy is the Goldilocks solution: not too hot, not too cool, but just right".

"This research would seem to indicate that excessive or sloppy lateral hiring (i.e. having a high attrition rate) can put law firms at a serious disadvantage vis-à-vis their competitors. In all cases, firms with lower attrition rates and generally lower hiring rates have performed better than their nearest rivals," said Brandon.

"Equally, being too conservative about hiring leads to sluggish performance. Too much new blood risks washing away what is there already, or diluting the culture; too little, and the firm stagnates, with new, organically-generated partners unable to drive revenue growth."

The harmful hiring strategies

Noting that lateral partner hiring strategies have become a "part of doing business these days" for Australian law firms, particularly in the last 10 years, former Middletons chief executive and consultant John Chisholm said that while some Australian firms are aggressive when it comes to their lateral partner hiring strategy, others are much less aggressive, preferring to grow the firm from within.

"But I would suspect there wouldn't be a major mid-tier or large law firm that doesn't have an ongoing brief out with head hunters," he said.

Without the same data available in Australia as is in the UK, Chisholm also conceded that Australia almost certainly has a similar attrition rate of laterally appointed partners as the UK.

"I think at any level, but particularly at the senior level, there's that old saying, 'Hire slowly, sack quickly'. I know 'sack quickly' sounds tough, but particularly at the partner level, that is the case," said Chisholm. "I think it's between 30 and 40 per cent here in Australia at the three to five-year level."

While it's difficult to pinpoint why a partner leaves a firm, Chisholm said hiring a partner laterally should not be a business decision but instead one based on people and culture.

"You don't look at it as buying or selling a chattel - it's much, much more than that. That's why sometimes they [lateral partner hires] fall over," he said. "It's a people decision and that's much more important."

One disadvantage of a firm's aggressive lateral partner hiring strategy, according to Chisholm, is the impact it has on morale within the firm, in terms of career progression. Observing that a lateral partner hire can have great benefits and can sometimes present a much-needed quick fix, Chisholm said the senior associates within firms with an aggressive hiring strategy will often feel that opportunities for career progression are available elsewhere.

"At a firm which is pretty aggressive on the lateral hire, you can understand some [senior associates] feel, 'Well for my career, maybe I'm better off at another firm or perhaps I've got more chance of being a partner in another firm than I have in my own'," he said.

In addition to a perceived or actual lack of opportunity for career progression, Chisholm said some lateral hires may not be successful due to the common mistake of overpromising and under-delivering.

"Sometimes firms just look at the business case. There's a block of fees and clients [the firm] needs ... The good firms look at whether the person is going to add to their culture or detract from their culture ... rather than just looking at the fees," he said.

"Firms work really hard on their culture, particularly at partner level. With every new entrant - and particularly if they bring a new team - it can and should have an effect on the firm's culture. It if has a positive effect that's fantastic but if it has a negative effect that's where things can go wrong."

Briana Everett

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Goldilocks solution key to lateral hiring strategy
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 23 2017
Education a passion for YL president
Promoted by University of Melbourne. Melbourne Law Masters student Phoebe Blank is successfully j...
Nov 23 2017
Anti-radicalisation programs playing ‘second fiddle’ to terrorism laws
Several academics have questioned the balance between Australia’s counterterrorism legislation and...
 William Ah Ket
Nov 23 2017
‘Bamboo ceiling’ thought piece wins inaugural law prize
A paper that explores the idea of affirmative action to achieve greater diversity among members of A...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...