find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
HREOC objects to elements of citizenship test

HREOC objects to elements of citizenship test

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS to establish a test for Australian citizenship fail to take into account disadvantaged applicants, according to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission…

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS to establish a test for Australian citizenship fail to take into account disadvantaged applicants, according to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC).

HREOC has made a submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in its inquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Testing) Bill 2007, which was introduced in the House of Representatives on 30 May this year.

According to HREOC, although the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship is given the discretion to determine the nature and form of the citizenship test, the minister has insufficient discretion to provide alternatives to the test where applicants, due to circumstance, are disadvantaged by having to sit the test.

“For instance, the Bill fails to make special provisions for persons who might make worthy Australian citizens yet are unable to pass a formal citizenship test due to past experiences of trauma or persecution, or due to limited education,” the HREOC submission said.

HREOC’s suggested solution to this problem is “a better balance in the allocation and oversight of ministerial discretion in these two areas of the Bill”.

“The Bill should provide a mechanism which provides for exemptions or an alternative process for applicants who are unfairly disadvantaged by having to sit a test,” it said.

Jurisdictions such as New Zealand and Canada have important safeguards, “by providing an element of flexibility to accommodate the individual circumstances of particular applicants who might be unfairly prejudiced in having to pass a formal citizenship test, but who would nevertheless make worthy Australian citizens”, the submission said.

The Commission has recommended the inclusion of the discretion to employ an alternative to the test, or to waive the eligibility requirements, in line with models used in NZ and Canada.

HREOC submitted that in NZ, “the Citizenship Act 1977 allows the minister to grant citizenship to the applicant if the minister is satisfied that granting citizenship ‘would be in the public interest because of exceptional circumstances of a humanitarian or other nature relating to the applicant’”.

Canada’s Citizenship Act 1985 allows for a citizenship judge to interview an applicant rather than formal testing in some circumstances, the submission said.

Although most people must sit the test, the Australian government’s official citizenship website says that people who are younger than 18 years of age, 60 years and over, or have permanent physical or mental incapacity rendering them incapable of understanding the nature of their application, will be excluded.

The citizenship test, the plan for which was announced on 11 December 2006 by the Federal Government, is intended to be computer-based, in English, and contain a sample of 20 to 30 multiple choice questions randomly chosen from a pool of 300.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

HREOC objects to elements of citizenship test
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...