find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Direct action

Direct action

There are many benefits to directly briefing barristers for in-house counsel, writes ACLA CEO Trish Hyde.

There are many benefits to directly briefing barristers for in-house counsel, writes ACLA CEO Trish Hyde.

Two out of every five in-house counsel have done it in the past 12 months, some more than five times.

It is not a new concept, but it is one that cost-conscious, savvy in-house lawyers are employing more and more. The ‘it’ I’m referring to? Directly briefing a barrister.

The principle is simple — by directly briefing a barrister you get timely, cost-effective, expert advice that can be used by the organisation to understand a litigation risk, develop a strategy or fill an expertise gap in the in-house team’s advice.

In the recent ACLA Trends Survey, 34 per cent of in-house lawyers said they had directly briefed a barrister between one and five times in the past year, and a further eight per cent said they had directly briefed a barrister more than five times in the year. Litigation support, specialist industry knowledge and issues management were the top matters in-house counsel used this practice method for.

The survey also identified why in-house counsel chose to use direct briefing: more that 70 per cent go to a barrister for specialist expertise. Other advantages cited for direct briefing included: accessing cost-effective advice (58%); direct-and-to-the-point advice (35%); quick advice (28%) and advice to enhance the organisation’s decision making (21%).

So, with all these good reasons to be directly briefing a barrister, why aren’t more people using this practice method?

The answer is two-fold.

Firstly, direct briefing is not right for everyone or in every circumstance. Accessing a barrister to get a discreet piece of advice on a specialised subject matter is effective as it leverages their skill and knowledge base. But they cannot replace law firms. The value of law firms comes from the longer-term work and ability to understand a client’s long-term needs.

Secondly, there is a false perception that direct briefing is difficult. Images of specially-drafted briefs tied with ribbon come to mind and this image leaves the impression that it is complicated. Ironically, this couldn’t be further from the truth. When I mentioned this perception to a barrister’s clerk, he laughed, pointed at the phone on his desk and said it is as easy as picking up the phone and calling the barrister. While this may be a little too informal for some, it is a long way from the specially-drafted briefs tied with ribbon.

In a former role, I used direct briefing of barristers to get advice to support strategy development and tactical implementation into corporate communications. I have seen the benefits firsthand – a 12-hour turnaround and expert opinion that is concise and implementable. It was a perfect fit for what we were after.

If you are looking for a barrister, ACLA members can access the ACLA online barrister directory, which is searchable by specialty and lists more than 200 barristers.

Trish Hyde is the CEO of the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association, the professional body for in-house lawyers.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Direct action
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...