find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Gender discrimination deniers

Gender discrimination deniers

Gender equality is a polarising issue.

I have found, in both professional and social settings, that when the topic is raised it often divides a room into two distinct groups – the supporters and the deniers.

This was the case recently when Lawyers Weekly reported on the findings of a study by the Law Council of Australia (LCA), which found that women face significant levels of discrimination.

The National Attrition and Re-engagement study (NARS) drew the praise and support of men and women who recognise that the legal profession has a long way to go before it achieves true gender equality.

It also attracted criticism from ‘gender discrimination deniers’ – those who do not believe that bias against women, whether unconscious or conscious, exists.

“Sigh, the usual whining from female law staff to advance their careers on something other than merit. So tired of this,” said one denier.

Another commented: “Boring! Don't believe it! Everyone is subject to discrimination, not only women.”

It is true that this kind of research is not an exact science and the deniers are quick to point out its flaws.

But you can’t simply dismiss a study that attracted around 4000 responses with tired clichés.

Such criticisms, which don’t address the results of NARS, reflect more on the inherent bias of the commentator(s) than any shortcomings in the research.

NARS does provide valuable insight into what is causing the high rates of female attrition and the low representation of women in senior positions.

These issues exist, there’s no denying that.


Difficult conversations

The conversation between supporters and deniers becomes even more strained when you move beyond overt discrimination to indirect forms, such as demeaning and condescending language by clients or colleagues and exclusion from conversation or social activities.

These examples cited in the LCA study may not be as worrying as data that suggests half of women lawyers have experienced discrimination and bullying or intimidation, and one in four had been sexually harassed in the workplace.

Nor is it as disturbing as reports of unwanted advances and inappropriate sexual behaviour.

But that doesn’t make it acceptable. Making excuses for any form of discrimination reflects poorly on the legal profession.


Seeking solutions

This study, and the many others that will follow, does not intend to merely shame lawyers by exposing bad behaviour. It seeks to propose solutions to problems that are driving women out of the profession, which is costing firms knowledge and money.

It has also started the legal profession on an evidence-based approach to gender issues.

Much more needs to be done, but the appropriately termed ‘landmark study’ provides the yardstick by which future policies to tackle female attrition and inequality in the law will be judged as a success or failure.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Gender discrimination deniers
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...