find the latest legal job
Inhouse Legal Counsel -18 months-4 PAE - Real Estate Investment Company
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· In brand new prestigious CBD offices
View details
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
Leaving large law

Leaving large law

The spate of small start-up firms and continuing success of established boutiques is putting unprecedented pressure on the large law firm model.

When James Ryan was speaking to Lawyers Weekly about why he decided to leave Piper Alderman and co-found his own firm with senior Pipers partner Robert Speirs, he did not mince words.

“Like many within our industry, I was particularly disengaged with the way large law firms were operated – seemingly void of quality management, commercial responsiveness and innovation,” he said of his decision to start Speirs Ryan.

James is right.

The large law firm model, by its very nature, stymies rather than allows innovation.

Of course, large law firms are partly a victim of their own success.

It is much easier to get 10 partners to agree to something when compared to 100.

“Small firms are more nimble, able to adapt their prices better and reduce cost far more competitively than large firms,” said a key figure within a large law firm at a recent breakfast attended by Lawyers Weekly that included a selection of chief information officers and chief financial officers.


Culture Wars

The fact that boutique firms are “nimble” and do not bog down their senior lawyers with the institutional conflicts and administrative burdens that weigh down their large-law firm colleagues is an obvious advantage that small firms naturally garner.

But this is not why boutique firms are striking such a chord with clients and lawyers at the moment.

The most striking and important advantage that boutique firms have in the current marketplace is one based around culture.

“Culture” is one of those buzz words you often hear from law firms when spruiking their wares as to why their firm is special or different.

Such claims, of course, are spurious when you continue to rigidly adhere to timesheets, oppressive billable-hour targets, expect lawyers to work excessively long hours and foster an environment where lawyers work in silos.

“If there is this cultural misfit it causes practitioners to re-evaluate where they want to practice law and how they practice law,” said Mark White, a senior lawyer who left the partnership of CBP Lawyers in October last year to start his own firm.

When Lawyers Weekly exclusively revealed that Tony O’Malley, the former head of King & Wood Mallesons in Australia, had started his firm with his former KWM colleague Tim Blue, he let the cat out of the bag.

“It is quite liberating operating in a small start-up environment,” he said of his new firm LCR Advisory.

The striking similarities between many of the boutique firms that have been launched recently is the fact that they are being started by lawyers from large law environments who are rejecting the fundamental underpinnings of the large law firm model.

Hive Legal was founded by the senior Minter Ellison partners Jacinta de Witts and Mitzi Gilligan, along with the DLA Piper duo Simon Davidson and Peter Monk, the latter of whom was the head of DLA’s Melbourne office.

What Hive Legal offers is the antithesis of the way the former firms of its founders went about their business.

High overheads and the billable-hour are out, flexible work options and alternative fee structures are in.

“[Large firms] have their reward and recognition systems very deeply embedded in the whole concept of time recording and hourly billing and it is very hard for them to break away from that infrastructure,” said Gilligan when talking to Lawyers Weekly.

A new international boutique entrant, Keypoint Law, has abolished billable-hour targets and is offering its fee earners the chance to pocket 70 per cent of the fees they generate from clients, which is significantly higher than what most large law firms offer their lawyers.


Suits you Sir and Miss

The senior large law figures that have started these boutique firms have been able to do so from a position of strength.

Their respective clients are wedded to them individually, rather than the firm they were previously at, so they have had no problems establishing their practice.

Indeed, Speirs Ryan has acted on matters to the value of half-a-billion dollars in transacted property within its first three months of operation.

These new firms are not only attracting significant clients, they are also attracting the interest of the best young lawyers looking outside the traditional prism of a large-law career.

“We have seen university medallists come across our desk who we wouldn’t have expected to be available at this stage of the year,” said Oliver Talbot, a former McCullough Robertson partner who founded his own boutique firm in March with his former McCullough Robertson colleague Tim Sayer.

Lawyers of all ages are attracted to firms that: do high-end work, offer a high degree of personal autonomy, provide flexible work options, show a commitment to move away from the billable-hour and give lawyers the sense they are not just another cog in the machine.

Large law firms that continue to obfuscate about moving to such a model will find that its best and brightest lawyers won’t be so reticent to look elsewhere.


Justin Whealing (pictured) is the editor of Lawyers Weekly

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Leaving large law
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Animal law moots, advocacy, Melbourne University, Australia and New Zealand Intervarsity Moot on Animal Law
Sep 25 2017
Moot unleashes animal advocacy
Melbourne has played host to one of the largest animal law moots, with student participants put th...
Sep 25 2017
Transgender teens should not need legal approval for hormone treatment, court hears
A transgender 17-year-old known as Kelvin has appealed in the Family Court against the requirement o...
Appointed, Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
Sep 25 2017
NFP CEO appointed Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
The CEO of a Victorian not-for profit pro bono legal services provider has been named as the state...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...